Talk Shows

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:36 pm

This is the hostess for an Italian T.V. talk show...

And this is the hostess for an AmericanT.V. talk show..

To enroll in your nearest language school to learn Italian, call: 800-555-ciao!

el guapo · Post by **el guapo** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:37 pm

yes i agree

dubs · Post by **dubs** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:45 pm

You can get cheap flights to Rome from here for about 20 quid....I'm just sayin'

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:46 pm

dubs;731564 wrote: You can get cheap flights to Rome from here for about 20 quid....I'm just sayin'

:wah:

Catching the red eye then ?

dubs · Post by **dubs** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:48 pm

Nomad;731566 wrote: :wah:

Catching the red eye then ?

My eyes are already red...Might have to blink soon! :wah:

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:09 pm

I loathe Rosie but I'd rather have her than to have to look at some cheaply dressed hosebag. I'm sure that I'm in the minority....:rolleyes:

Sheryl · Post by **Sheryl** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:11 pm

RedGlitter;731596 wrote: I loathe Rosie but I'd rather have her than to have to look at some cheaply dressed hosebag. I'm sure that I'm in the minority....:rolleyes:

I dunno. A bottle of whiskey and a few shots glasses you could have a drinking game with the Italian show. Every time a nipple slips ya gotta take a shot. :sneaky:

ok been around my nephews to much today.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:28 pm

RedGlitter;731596 wrote: I loathe Rosie but I'd rather have her than to have to look at some cheaply dressed hosebag. I'm sure that I'm in the minority....:rolleyes:

Yes you are.

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:32 pm

Sheryl;731598 wrote: I dunno. A bottle of whiskey and a few shots glasses you could have a drinking game with the Italian show. Every time a nipple slips ya gotta take a shot. :sneaky:

ok been around my nephews to much today.

:wah:

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:34 pm

I'm still trying to figure out what that glittery band is under her breasts. Coins? Big sequins? Rhinestones? Tips from men? (Ha!) Change for a $2 bill?

Ok, ok....really what is it? It's surely not to keep her "dress" on.

KB. · Post by **KB.** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:03 pm

God, I love Italian women.

Patsy Warnick · Post by **Patsy Warnick** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:09 pm

Red

I think that gold glitter band is to draw your attention to that area - in case nothing else does..:-2

I guess we know what the men here want for Christmas, a HO

Patsy

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:11 pm

Patsy Warnick;731683 wrote: Red

I think that gold glitter band is to draw your attention to that area - in case nothing else does..:-2

I guess we know what the men here want for Christmas, a HO

Patsy

:wah::wah::wah: Patsy you crack me up!! :-6

KB. · Post by **KB.** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:15 pm

Patsy Warnick;731683 wrote: Red

I think that gold glitter band is to draw your attention to that area - in case nothing else does..:-2

I guess we know what the men here want for Christmas, a HO

Patsy

Wrong. The correct answer would have been a Ho, Ho, Ho.

I think it's funny that less tasteful pictures were posted for the women just yesterday and that was fine. A ho by any other name is still a ho.

I'll take three. Forget a good woman. I gave up on it and started dating strippers again. Just keep the bed warm. I can cook and keep myself intellectually stimulated just fine.

Patsy Warnick · Post by **Patsy Warnick** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:53 pm

KB

you don't need to correct me - its one HO out of Ho Ho Ho

if there had been 3 Ho's in the picture then it would be Ho Ho Ho...

and no she won't be under the tree or under anything else.

Patsy

watermark · Post by **watermark** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:14 pm

Is this all you men care about, big boobs??

Well, Nomad, I think those pics are flagrantly chauvinistic. First off I'd have to say that if those boobs were on a heavy woman you men would probably not find them so appealing. Some men would because these men are stirred up sexually (only) by a large woman's physique (not necessarily any other aspect of her being), but most of you men would not.

Also, I bet this woman's back hurts with such large boobs. Just so you know the probs with big boobs.

Another thing is this woman can afford to have big boobs, probably because she doesn't have to do anything but ring a bell for her maid.

Also I'd like to ask the originator of this post what difference does it make who the ho ho I mean host is as long as the network is making a profit. Does anyone care? I'm sure the network doesn't!

Finally, no, RG, you aren't in the minority for your views in my estimation. Most of us feel the same way, we just aren't quite as articulate as you!

Erin

sunny104 · Post by **sunny104** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:02 am

I'm curious too why no one comments when hot, half naked guys are posted for "us" but it's *wrong* when an attractive female is posted??

just curious.....:-3

grh · Post by **grh** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:33 am

sunny104;731838 wrote: I'm curious too why no one comments when hot, half naked guys are posted for "us" but it's *wrong* when an attractive female is posted??

just curious.....:-3

I don't care what they look at so long as it isn't me.:wah:

As for the guy pics, those aren't similar, really... to be fair, shouldn't the nuts be hanging out and just the 'manly spear' be covered:p

sunny104 · Post by **sunny104** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:35 am

grh;731873 wrote: I don't care what they look at so long as it isn't me.:wah:

As for the guy pics, those aren't similar, really... to be fair, shouldn't the nuts be hanging out and just the 'manly spear' be covered:p

well, ideally, yes.....:p

:wah:

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:00 pm

grh;731873 wrote: I don't care what they look at so long as it isn't me.:wah:

As for the guy pics, those aren't similar, really... to be fair, shouldn't the nuts be hanging out and just the 'manly spear' be covered:p

sunny104;731876 wrote: well, ideally, yes.....:p

:wah:
ALLRIGHT!!!! Girls with nut fetishes. Gotta love them..

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:32 pm

How long has Bryn been in this thread ?

He was lurking at the bottom yesterday. I see hes still there.

And why do some women think men looking at beautiful women is chauvinistic ?

Hell my wife looks at beautiful women.

Theres something wrong with breasts ?

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:46 pm

watermark;731697 wrote: Is this all you men care about, big boobs??

Well, Nomad, I think those pics are flagrantly chauvinistic. First off I'd have to say that if those boobs were on a heavy woman you men would probably not find them so appealing. Some men would because these men are stirred up sexually (only) by a large woman's physique (not necessarily any other aspect of her being), but most of you men would not.

Also, I bet this woman's back hurts with such large boobs. Just so you know the probs with big boobs.

Another thing is this woman can afford to have big boobs, probably because she doesn't have to do anything but ring a bell for her maid.

Also I'd like to ask the originator of this post what difference does it make who the ho ho I mean host is as long as the network is making a profit. Does anyone care? I'm sure the network doesn't!

Finally, no, RG, you aren't in the minority for your views in my estimation. Most of us feel the same way, we just aren't quite as articulate as you!

Erin

koan · Post by **koan** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:59 pm

they use toupe tape to keep the fabric in place.

nifty trick, that is.

grh · Post by **grh** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:01 pm

Nomad;732228 wrote: How long has Bryn been in this thread ?

He was lurking at the bottom yesterday. I see hes still there.

And why do some women think men looking at beautiful women is chauvinistic ?

Hell my wife looks at beautiful women.

Theres something wrong with breasts ?

I was gonna say it seems more sexist to me then chauvinistic, but then I looked up 'sexist'

sex·ism (skszm)

n.

1. Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.

2. Attitudes, conditions, or behaviors that promote stereotyping of social roles based on gender.

shoot! forgot to source this...think it was free on line dictionary..

Doesn't that first definition seem kinda 'sexist' to you?

What do you suppose they are really trying to say with an expression like 'especially discrimination against women'

Off to find a gent in tighty whities to share in this titillating thread!:wah:

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:09 pm

I think she looks hot! Good luck to her, it is a 'special' show she hosts? If I looked like that and someone offered me money to host a show I'd go for it!:guitarist

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:16 pm

grh;732254 wrote: I was gonna say it seems more sexist to me then chauvinistic, but then I looked up 'sexist'

sex·ism (skszm)

n.

1. Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.

2. Attitudes, conditions, or behaviors that promote stereotyping of social roles based on gender.

shoot! forgot to source this...think it was free on line dictionary..

Doesn't that first definition seem kinda 'sexist' to you?

What do you suppose they are really trying to say with an expression like 'especially discrimination against women'

Off to find a gent in tighty whities to share in this titillating thread!:wah:

pbbtthhhh.......

Women have breasts.

How is looking at them sexist or discriminatory ?

koan · Post by **koan** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:24 pm

If we're demanding IQ test minimums for anyone in the entertainment industry we'll have a lot of suddenly unemployed, pretty people.

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:28 pm

koan;732267 wrote: If we're demanding IQ test minimums for anyone in the entertainment industry we'll have a lot of suddenly unemployed, pretty people.

You are probably right, but if we reverse the situation and have a really ugly but smart person hosting a show would it get the same ratings? Obviously it all depends on the show but I know for myself it's always nice to have some eye candy to watch :sneaky::wah:

watermark · Post by **watermark** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:28 pm

Okay, sexist is probably the right word. Not chauvinistic.

E

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:31 pm

watermark;732269 wrote: Okay, sexist is probably the right word. Not chauvinistic.

E

Ok.

Should men just pretend breasts dont exist ?

Should we look the other way ?

Should we deny we find them fascinating ?

Not talk about them ?

What do you find physically attractive about men ?

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:35 pm

Nomad;732270 wrote: Ok.

Should men just pretend breasts dont exist ? No

Should we look the other way ? Only if the wife is watching

Should we deny we find them fascinating ? No

Not talk about them ? No

What do you find physically attractive about men ? Chest, bum, smile, legs, back

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:45 pm

SuzyB;732271 wrote: Chest, bum, smile, legs, back

Watermark ?

Is this a sexist attitude ?

grh · Post by **grh** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:17 pm

Nomad;732270 wrote: Ok.

Should men just pretend breasts dont exist ?

Should we look the other way ?

Should we deny we find them fascinating ?

Not talk about them ?

What do you find physically attractive about men ?

one eyed monster?

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:51 pm

Nomad;732228 wrote: How long has Bryn been in this thread ?

He was lurking at the bottom yesterday. I see hes still there.

And why do some women think men looking at beautiful women is chauvinistic ?

Hell my wife looks at beautiful women.

Theres something wrong with breasts ?

Must we be damn near naked to be beautiful?

Do you also look at us when we're dressed normally?

Why is she considered beautiful because you can see everything she's got, which truthfully, ain't much?

These are not rhetorical.

watermark · Post by **watermark** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:19 pm

Nomad;732273 wrote: Watermark ?

Is this a sexist attitude ?

No, and I'll tell you why. You specifically asked this question and all suzyb did was answer you as she wanted.

The thing is I do not discriminate in my attitude about body parts that the opposite may or may not find attractive; women perpetuate the myth that the bod is absolutely 'it'. It's just that in my opinion men focus on genitals to the exclusion of most anything else.

Do you men not find a woman's intellect attractive? Someone posted on the thread about finding it fun or stimulating to watch a show when the host had a good body (as measured by distorted worldly standards imho) even if this person had no brains, nothing worthwhile to listen to. That was my take on the post. I highly disagree. For me intellect, which includes a wide variety of things such as creativity, humor, classical smarts, counts a million times more in my attraction radar than mere physical traits.

Of course I probably have to be honest and say that since I'm an individual I have my own notions or tastes about what human physical qualities or body parts I'm particularly fond of such as, chest, for example, but not because I find a buff, muscular man especially sexually arousing. Personally I find the man's chest attractive because of what it signifies to me such as warmth, acceptance, mutuality, affection, etcetera.

I'm opposed to most media images that pretend to some authority on the subject: So says the TV industry with its sublimatory messages --you will watch this program because we work hard at bringing you the very finest in the human body-- :rolleyes:(never mind if this is a false image or is helping to make everyone completely superficial).

But, you know, everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion. I don't have to watch such crap TV if I choose not to, and anyone here has the option of not listening to me as well. But I will state my opinion to you on this if it comes up, or to my daughter, or son, or nephew, or anyone I feel might be impacted by my attitude.

Erin

Snooze · Post by **Snooze** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:27 pm

koan · Post by **koan** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:29 pm

hey, Nomad....

got any pictures of her standing up? :yh_pray

Snooze · Post by **Snooze** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:34 pm

Classy :rolleyes:

koan · Post by **koan** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:38 pm

I like the first outfit better.

WonderWendy3 · Post by **WonderWendy3** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:43 pm

I think the first woman is absolutely gorgeous and well Rosie isn't.....the facts are facts....

She is beautiful and she has beautiful breasts and body. If I looked like that, damn skippy I'd be a talk show host and be proud of it!

A sexist in my mind is a man that doesn't appreciate women, treats them like a slave and beneath them....

Men that appreciate a beautiful woman is perfectly normal.

Men are attracted by sight, we all know this....nothing wrong with them enjoying it when they see it...just so they treat the woman they are commited to with the utmost respect.

Sheryl · Post by **Sheryl** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:56 pm

Snooze;732306 wrote: Classy :rolleyes:

is she fixing to go to bed..looks more lingerie

watermark · Post by **watermark** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:06 pm

I don't understand why men are like that wonderwendy. I don't get it---once again I don't get it. Maybe men mellow with age and don't need to focus so much on physcial properties? I want one of those. I don't like this aspect of men. Just personally and all.

Why do you think you'd want to do a TV show just because of your body?? Just asking. No need to answer if you feel offended. I'm curious to know why women with certain physical properties (youth included) would find being valued for this above other qualities they might possess is motivating for them.

Again, not trying to be hostile to your post. It was just the most recent one I could find to spark my question.

E

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:09 pm

Rosie looks like a hag not because she dresses modestly but because she doesn't do anything to make herself look good.

A classy woman knows how to get men to look at her without having to dress like she goes for about $1.75.

WonderWendy3 · Post by **WonderWendy3** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:24 pm

watermark;732323 wrote: I don't understand why men are like that wonderwendy. I don't get it---once again I don't get it. Maybe men mellow with age and don't need to focus so much on physcial properties? I want one of those. I don't like this aspect of men. Just personally and all.

Why do you think you'd want to do a TV show just because of your body?? Just asking. No need to answer if you feel offended. I'm curious to know why women with certain physical properties (youth included) would find being valued for this above other qualities they might possess is motivating for them.

Again, not trying to be hostile to your post. It was just the most recent one I could find to spark my question.

E

No offense taken Erin and I see what you are saying, I wouldn't be a talk show JUST because of my body....and tbh, I would be a talk show host the way I look now. I didn't mean to imply that just because I don't have a perfect body that I am ashamed of myself....I admire women with beautiful bodies....woman enough to admit it...thats all....

Men are men....they are attracted by sight, us women need to be held and comforted. Sure we like to look at a hard bodied man...but I don't have an orgasm or get all excited over it...I look at him and say, thats nice.....and move on....whearas men can get an erection by sight...if they focus on it long enough. Just the way that we are made ....I have accepted this a long time ago:)

koan · Post by **koan** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:30 pm

We're not really imagining that the hostess picks her wardrobe, right? The studio hires very expensive wardrobe designers for that. This woman is just willing to wear it.

My boss has a calendar of mostly naked women in the workshop and I told him I didn't mind if he didn't turn the page to December. Miss November was exciting to see every morning!

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:13 am

WonderWendy3;732311 wrote: I think the first woman is absolutely gorgeous and well Rosie isn't.....the facts are facts....

She is beautiful and she has beautiful breasts and body. If I looked like that, damn skippy I'd be a talk show host and be proud of it!

A sexist in my mind is a man that doesn't appreciate women, treats them like a slave and beneath them....

Men that appreciate a beautiful woman is perfectly normal.

Men are attracted by sight, we all know this....nothing wrong with them enjoying it when they see it...just so they treat the woman they are commited to with the utmost respect.

That made me laugh out loud 'damn skippy' I'd never heard that before!

WonderWendy3;732333 wrote: No offense taken Erin and I see what you are saying, I wouldn't be a talk show JUST because of my body....and tbh, I would be a talk show host the way I look now. I didn't mean to imply that just because I don't have a perfect body that I am ashamed of myself....I admire women with beautiful bodies....woman enough to admit it...thats all....

Men are men....they are attracted by sight, us women need to be held and comforted. Sure we like to look at a hard bodied man...but I don't have an orgasm or get all excited over it...I look at him and say, thats nice.....and move on....whearas men can get an erection by sight...if they focus on it long enough. Just the way that we are made ....I have accepted this a long time ago:)

:sneaky::sneaky:

koan;732430 wrote: We're not really imagining that the hostess picks her wardrobe, right? The studio hires very expensive wardrobe designers for that. This woman is just willing to wear it.

My boss has a calendar of mostly naked women in the workshop and I told him I didn't mind if he didn't turn the page to December. Miss November was exciting to see every morning!

:wah: :wah: I love it!

KB. · Post by **KB.** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:46 am

Of course she is beautiful, physically. Of course we look and enjoy the looking. We would also look at her if she had clothes on, but she don't so there you go. Post some pictures of a man with abs of steel and his manly bits barely covered and no one says a thing, but let some women with a nice set of tits come around and all of a sudden we are pigs who can barely contain ourselves. You all have read my thoughts on women. If that is the best you can think of me and the rest of the good men here at FG then so be it.

There are a dozen women in my life who are more attractive to me. There a dozen more I know who are more attractive, more beautiful, and more real. That doesn't change the fact that if the woman in the first post walks by I'm going to watch her coming and going. I'm a horribly sexist male.

KB. · Post by **KB.** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:47 am

KB. · Post by **KB.** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:47 am

There you go. Everyone of them is more beautiful than the woman on that talk show. Get off of the high horse, have a little fun, and quit thinking that just because a man likes to look at a set of tits that he is garbage. Notice they all have clothes on; hell they would all make better talk show hosts.

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:57 am

Love the pics KB :-6