6mth jail sentance for Jones

suzycreamcheese · Post by **suzycreamcheese** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:36 am

6mth jail sentance for jones

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7182969.stm

American Olympian Marion Jones has been sentenced to six months in prison for lying about steroid use and involvement in a drugs fraud case.

The former sprinter pleaded guilty last October and was sentenced on Friday.

Mother-of-two Jones, 32, had asked US District Judge Kenneth Karas to be "as merciful as a human being can be".

But the judge imposed the maximum under her plea deal "because of the need for general deterrence and the need to promote respect for the law".

Judge Karas said he believed a message needed to be sent to athletes who have abused drugs and as a result, have overlooked the values of "hard work, dedication, teamwork and sportsmanship".

"Athletes in society have an elevated status, they entertain, they inspire, and perhaps, most important, they serve as role models."

He added: "Nobody is above the legal obligation to tell the truth."

MARION JONES FACTS

Born: 12/10/75, Los Angeles

Olympic medals: 100m gold (2000), 200m gold (2000) 4x400m gold (2000) 4x100m bronze (2000), Long jump bronze (2000)

World championship medals: 100m gold (1997, 99), 200m gold (2001), 4x100m (gold), 100m silver (2001) Long jump bronze (1999)

* Jones was stripped of all her medals and results from September 2000

Afterwards Jones said outside court: "I respect the judge's order, and I truly hope that people will learn from my mistakes."

Lawyers for the defence had asked the judge to give the former sprinter probation or house arrest.

Having already apologised, retired and given up her five Olympic medals, Jones has been punished enough, they argued.

Jones sentencing included two years' probation and supervised release, during which she will be required to perform 800 hours of community service.

She has been ordered to surrender on 11 March to begin her jail term.

'Deeply sorry'

A tearful Jones asked the judge to consider her commitment to her two children, including an infant son she is still nursing.

"Your honour, I absolutely realise the gravity of these offences and I am deeply sorry," she said.

Lawyers for the prosecution had suggested any sentence between probation and six months would be fair.

The offences here are serious. They each involve lies made three years apart

Judge Kenneth Karas

Fall from grace

Once arguably the most famous female athlete in the world, Jones won gold in the 100m, 200m and 4x400m relay as well as bronzes in the long jump and 4x100m relay, at the Sydney Olympics in 2000.

While her charisma and big smile won her a global fan base, her success on the track coupled with photogenic looks won her lucrative endorsements.

But she suffered a spectacular fall from glory last October, admitting lying to a federal investigator in November 2003 when she denied using performance-enhancing drugs.

She admitted using a steroid between September 2000 and July 2001.

Tearful apology

Jones also pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in 2003 about a separate cheque fraud case involving her former boyfriend, sprinter Tim Montgomery, the father of her son, Monty.

Montgomery and several others have been convicted in that scam.

Judge Karas had sought advice as to whether he could go beyond the six-month maximum sentence suggested in the plea deal.

"The offences here are serious. They each involve lies made three years apart," he said on Friday, adding that Jones had made "not a one-off mistake... but a repetition in an attempt to break the law".

He said he did not believe a statement by Jones in October when she said she did not realise she was taking steroids until after the 2000 Olympic Games.

"That is very difficult to believe, that a top-notch athlete... would not be keenly aware of what he or she put in her body," the judge said.

Jones, who returned her medals even before the International Olympic Committee ordered her to do so, has since had her name expunged from the record books.

Hers was one of a number of high-profile doping cases involving top American athletes that have prompted the US Olympic Committee to team up with Major League Baseball and the National Football League with a new initiative aimed at combating drug use in US sport.

Now I realise you cant have steroided up people competing in the olympic games really, but WTF its only sport. I hardly think its worthy of a custodial sentance, especially when she has two young children, one who is a baby and still being breastfed. What the hell did THEY do to deserve having their mother removed???

Absolutely preposterous.

Prisons shouldnt be for this! Shes not a danger to the public. Completely OTT

grh · Post by **grh** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:03 am

suzycreamcheese;757087 wrote: 6mth jail sentance for jones

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7182969.stm

Now I realise you cant have steroided up people competing in the olympic games really, but WTF its only sport. I hardly think its worthy of a custodial sentance, especially when she has two young children, one who is a baby and still being breastfed. What the hell did THEY do to deserve having their mother removed???

Absolutely preposterous.

Prisons shouldnt be for this! Shes not a danger to the public. Completely OTT

I think it is interesting that she's going to jail. It reminded me of Martha Stewart and all the insider trading that was going on at the time she went to jail for it. Perhaps men just didn't get the same press for going to jail.

But I have no problem with sending her to jail for what she did. We send young mothers to jail for writing bad checks and such all the time. Why shouldn't this lady do her time?

CARLA · Post by **CARLA** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:42 am

Eactly and 6 months is fair.

[QUOTE]Perjury, is perjury [/QUOTE]

Post by **spot** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:47 am

JAB;757196 wrote: Perjury, is perjury and our current judicial system says this is punishable with a sentence. Should we start taking into account what it is the individual lied about before imposing a sentence?

Perhaps we should. Perhaps we should consider whether perjury ought to be a crime at all. Perhaps the judicial system is over-pompous and takes itself too seriously. Perhaps too many people get sent to jail for things which haven't damaged the community in any way whatever.

We don't send people to jail here for passing bad checks either. We have more effective, less destructive, ways of dealing with them.

Post by **spot** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:44 am

JAB;771866 wrote: If someone's lie happened to unfairly convict another sending them to a lengthy prison sentence, you don't think the liar should be punished once he is found out?

Isn't it usually agreed that extreme cases make bad law? How often does what you envisage happen? That's a once in a blue moon instance.

If removing the threat of a perjury conviction for lying has the effect of reducing the credibility of witnesses that might be no bad thing. I suggest that far more witnesses lie in court than get prosecuted for perjury afterwards, and removing the comfort zone from the jury of "oh, he was on oath, we have to believe that evidence" is a good consequence.