Instruction and advice for the young bride

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:26 pm

This is a reprint of an article in The Madison Institute Newsletter, Fall Issue, 1894:

http://www.squaredancecd.com/Bride/brides.htm

Galbally · Post by **Galbally** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:30 pm

Good jesus, what a miserable existence some people must have had in those days.

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:31 pm

yep thank god they found the clitoris in time for us lol:wah:

Galbally · Post by **Galbally** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:35 pm

Chezzie;842365 wrote: yep thank god they found the clitoris in time for us lol:wah:

Yes, somewhere New Guinea wasn't it?

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:36 pm

Galbally;842371 wrote: Yes, somewhere New Guinea wasn't it?

heh heh...I notice you didnt say "IN":sneaky:

Galbally · Post by **Galbally** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:39 pm

Chezzie;842373 wrote: heh heh...I notice you didnt say "IN":sneaky:

Quite. :rolleyes:

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:39 pm

Chezzie;842358 wrote: This is a reprint of an article in The Madison Institute Newsletter, Fall Issue, 1894:

http://www.squaredancecd.com/Bride/brides.htm

A spoof? Sadly, there's too much evidence to the contrary

along-for-the-ride · Post by **along-for-the-ride** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:48 pm

That was supposed to be a "wise" wife? Yeah...................right.:wah:

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:48 pm

Bryn Mawr;842379 wrote: A spoof? Sadly, there's too much evidence to the contrary

I agree that maybe it is now I look again....funny all the same lol:wah:

RedGlitter · Post by **RedGlitter** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:41 pm

Surely that can't be for real? I mean what a drag for the wife too. I noticed that was supposedly written in victorian times, which is known for being staid and prudish but now they say that wasn't completely true. I should hope not.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:43 pm

RedGlitter;842409 wrote: Surely that can't be for real? I mean what a drag for the wife too. I noticed that was supposedly written in victorian times, which is known for being staid and prudish but now they say that wasn't completely true. I should hope not.

Lots of prudery on the surface, lots of sauce under the mashed potato.

kiwimum76 · Post by **kiwimum76** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 7:27 pm

All I can say is that if every woman followed this twisted piece of writing, hardly anyone would even actually conceive very often. It was a good thing that lots of people didn't know how to read.

I think the woman writing this had some serious issues.

Galbally · Post by **Galbally** » Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:21 pm

kiwimum76;842500 wrote: All I can say is that if every woman followed this twisted piece of writing, hardly anyone would even actually conceive very often. It was a good thing that lots of people didn't know how to read.

I think the woman writing this had some serious issues.

Yeah, a chronic lack of a good hard shag every so often been the main one I think. :wah:

kiwimum76 · Post by **kiwimum76** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:52 am

Galbally;842517 wrote: Yeah, a chronic lack of a good hard shag every so often been the main one I think. :wah:

Amongst other things:wah:

mikeinie · Post by **mikeinie** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:45 am

Most men, if not denied, would demand sex almost every day. The wise bride will permit a maximum of two brief sexual experiences weekly during the first months of marriage. As time goes by she should make every effort to reduce this frequency.

Not much has changes over the years...

:-1

suzy_creamcheese · Post by **suzy_creamcheese** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:05 am

ROFL, just forwarded that link to my fiancé