Hillary's False FEC Reports.

[ChiptBeef]

"The Federal Election Commission (FEC) formally determined that Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign treasurer, Andrew Grossman, is legally responsible for the three false FEC reports that Hillary's finance director, David Rosen, was ciminally charged and tried for in mid-2005. Mr. Grossman signed a "Conciliation Agreement" with the FEC on December 13, 2005, admitting his culpability, and agreeing to pay a civil fine and amend his false reports to reflect the $721,000 that he failed to report since October 2000. This admission of responsibility by Hillary Clinton's campaign treasurer comes after FIVE years of denials and deceptions by Hillary's staff and her campaign officials, beginning with Hillary spokesman Howard Wolfson's false statements to the Washington Post days after Event 39 was produced and paid for by Paul in August 2000, and proceeding through false testimony given at the trial of finance director David Rosen for the offenses that Grossman is now taking responsibility for!"

http://www.peterfpaul.com/2005/12/hilla ... -will-you/

http://www.hillcap.org/default.php?page_id=6

http://www.hillcap.org/rosen_indictment.pdf

But we need to get over the Clinton's, right? That's just irrelevant stuff from the past..... :wah:

[Tombstone]

It's just amazing at how everyone they work with / deal with, is on the take.

The company you keep...

[StupidCowboyTricks]

Tombstone wrote: It's just amazing at how everyone they work with / deal with, is on the take.



The company you keep...




I want to Hold Your hand

....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:-4 -and when i touch you i feel happy inside

[Benjamin]

Look at these sources he's referencing:

www.hillcap.org

www.peterfpaul.com

These are Web sites of Peter F. Paul. Here is a little background on Peter F. Paul:

"In the 1970s, before even turning 30, Paul was a prominent civic leader in Miami, having become president of the city's World Trade Center. But in the late 1970s, he became involved with drug dealing and a complicated con that saw a group rip off the Castro government for $8.75 million for a boatload of coffee that did not exist.Paul was sentenced to eight years on cocaine-related charges, with three years concurrent for the coffee caper," John Dorschner wrote in the Miami Herald.

In 2001, after being detained in Brazil, where he was legally living for eight months before an SEC indictment in New York in June, 2001, "acting on a request from U.S. prosecutors, Brazilian police arrested Paul in August 2001 and held him in a Sao Paulo facility while he while he fought extradition."

In September 2003, "his legal defenses finally failed and he was moved to the Brooklyn, N.Y., Metropolitan Detention Center," Dorschner reported.

Ian Urbina reported March 15, 2005, in the New York Times that "Peter Paul turned on the Clintons with a vengeance, claiming that they bilked him out of nearly $2 million in campaign donations" and his "pursuit ... was championed by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group that has sued the Clintons repeatedly over the years."

However, Urbina says, "now Judicial Watch and Mr. Paul are battling each other. Mr. Paul says that the organization used his case solely to draw donations while doing little to solve his legal troubles. Last week, Judicial Watch filed court papers in California seeking to sever ties with Mr. Paul, who has, in turn, threatened to sue the group for nearly $1 million."
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peter_Paul

[Accountable]

Benjamin wrote: Look at these sources he's referencing:



www.hillcap.org

www.peterfpaul.com



These are Web sites of Peter F. Paul. Here is a little background on Peter F. Paul:



http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peter_PaulSo you're saying that the FEC did not determine as claimed, or only that he should find better sources?

[ChiptBeef]

Accountable wrote: So you're saying that the FEC did not determine as claimed, or only that he should find better sources?
"If you can't attack the message, attack the messenger." Not sure who said it originally, but it certainly fits in this case. At least Ben is being consistent.:wah:

[ChiptBeef]

flopstock wrote: I love it when the folks that are 'middle of the road' politically, finally disclose that it is a one way street!!



I wish I could say I was sorely disappointed, but this will be much more entertaining...



You may have held onto the cloak a bit longer if you had found even one republican to bash, but you folks just can't help yourself, can you?;)


Nice assumption, speculation and conjecture. You've got the right, though. Like Patrick Swayze said in Roadhouse... "Opinions vary."

"If you had found even one republican to bash..." No need. The leftist, liberal media elite have got the alleged corrupt Republicans covered. I believe in time management. No sense in being redundant. I'm just trying to shed light on the corruption that the East Coast, limousine liberals are ignoring.

"You folks?" That doesn't sound very inclusive and tolerant. Doesn't the political party that you identify with come equipped with a "big tent" large enough for all to be represented?

[CVX]

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: I want to Hold Your hand

....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:-4 -and when i touch you i feel happy inside


sheesh. There are hundreds of photographs of Clinton with the Saudi Royal Family.

[CVX]

Since there is usually soft logic coming from the UK regarding Clinton, let me spell out a few historical facts.

The Clinton Legacy

This list was compiled at the end of the Clinton administration.

The Clinton Scandal Index

RECORDS SET

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance

- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*

- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation

- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify

- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly

- First president sued for sexual harassment.

- First president accused of rape.

- First first lady to come under criminal investigation

- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case

- First president to establish a legal defense fund.

- First president to be held in contempt of court

- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions

- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad

- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

* According to our best information, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. A reader computes that there was a total of 31 Reagan era convictions, including 14 because of Iran-Contra and 16 in the Department of Housing & Urban Development scandal. 47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned. A key difference between the Clinton story and earlier ones was the number of criminals with whom he was associated before entering the White House.

* Using a far looser standard that included resignations, David R. Simon and D. Stanley Eitzen in Elite Deviance, say that 138 appointees of the Reagan administration either resigned under an ethical cloud or were criminally indicted. Curiously Haynes Johnson uses the same figure but with a different standard in "Sleep-Walking Through History: America in the Reagan Years: "By the end of his term, 138 administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever."

STARR-RAY INVESTIGATION

- Number of Starr-Ray investigation convictions or guilty pleas (including one governor, one associate attorney general and two Clinton business partners): 14

- Number of Clinton Cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 5

- Number of Reagan cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 4

- Number of top officials jailed in the Teapot Dome Scandal: 3

CRIME STATS

- Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47

- Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33

- Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61

- Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122

SMALTZ INVESTIGATION

- Guilty pleas and convictions obtained by Donald Smaltz in cases involving charges of bribery and fraud against former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy and associated individuals and businesses: 15

- Acquitted or overturned cases (including Espy): 6

- Fines and penalties assessed: $11.5 million

- Amount Tyson Food paid in fines and court costs: $6 million

CLINTON MACHINE CRIMES

FOR WHICH CONVICTIONS

HAVE BEEN OBTAINED

Drug trafficking (3), racketeering, extortion, bribery (4), tax evasion, kickbacks, embezzlement (2), fraud (12), conspiracy (5), fraudulent loans, illegal gifts (1), illegal campaign contributions (5), money laundering (6), perjury, obstruction of justice.

OTHER MATTERS INVESTIGATED BY SPECIAL PROSECUTORS

AND CONGRESS, OR REPORTED IN THE MEDIA

Bank and mail fraud, violations of campaign finance laws, illegal foreign campaign funding, improper exports of sensitive technology, physical violence and threats of violence, solicitation of perjury, intimidation of witnesses, bribery of witnesses, attempted intimidation of prosecutors, perjury before congressional committees, lying in statements to federal investigators and regulatory officials, flight of witnesses, obstruction of justice, bribery of cabinet members, real estate fraud, tax fraud, drug trafficking, failure to investigate drug trafficking, bribery of state officials, use of state police for personal purposes, exchange of promotions or benefits for sexual favors, using state police to provide false court testimony, laundering of drug money through a state agency, false reports by medical examiners and others investigating suspicious deaths, the firing of the RTC and FBI director when these agencies were investigating Clinton and his associates, failure to conduct autopsies in suspicious deaths, providing jobs in return for silence by witnesses, drug abuse, improper acquisition and use of 900 FBI files, improper futures trading, murder, sexual abuse of employees, false testimony before a federal judge, shredding of documents, withholding and concealment of subpoenaed documents, fabricated charges against (and improper firing of) White House employees, inviting drug traffickers, foreign agents and participants in organized crime to the White House.

ARKANSAS ALTZHEIMER'S

Number of times that Clinton figures who testified in court or before Congress said that they didn't remember, didn't know, or something similar.

Bill Kennedy 116

Harold Ickes 148

Ricki Seidman 160

Bruce Lindsey 161

Bill Burton 191

Mark Gearan 221

Mack McLarty 233

Neil Egglseston 250

Hillary Clinton 250

John Podesta 264

Jennifer O'Connor 343

Dwight Holton 348

Patsy Thomasson 420

Jeff Eller 697

FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES: In the portions of President Clinton's Jan. 17 deposition that have been made public in the Paula Jones case, his memory failed him 267 times. This is a list of his answers and how many times he gave each one.

I don't remember - 71

I don't know - 62

I'm not sure - 17

I have no idea - 10

I don't believe so - 9

I don't recall - 8

I don't think so - 8

I don't have any specific recollection - 6

I have no recollection - 4

Not to my knowledge - 4

I just don't remember - 4

I don't believe - 4

I have no specific recollection - 3

I might have - 3

I don't have any recollection of that - 2 I don't have a specific memory - 2

I don't have any memory of that - 2

I just can't say - 2

I have no direct knowledge of that - 2

I don't have any idea - 2

Not that I recall - 2

I don't believe I did - 2

I can't remember - 2

I can't say - 2

I do not remember doing so - 2

Not that I remember - 2

I'm not aware - 1

I honestly don't know - 1

I don't believe that I did - 1

I'm fairly sure - 1

I have no other recollection - 1

I'm not positive - 1

I certainly don't think so - 1

I don't really remember - 1

I would have no way of remembering that - 1

That's what I believe happened - 1

To my knowledge, no - 1

To the best of my knowledge - 1

To the best of my memory - 1

I honestly don't recall - 1

I honestly don't remember - 1

That's all I know - 1

I don't have an independent recollection of that - 1

I don't actually have an independent memory of that - 1

As far as I know - 1

I don't believe I ever did that - 1

That's all I know about that - 1

I'm just not sure - 1

Nothing that I remember - 1

I simply don't know - 1

I would have no idea - 1

I don't know anything about that - 1

I don't have any direct knowledge of that - 1

I just don't know - 1

I really don't know - 1

I can't deny that, I just -- I have no memory of that at all - 1

THE CLINTON LEGACY:

LONELY HONOR

Here are some of the all too rare public officials, reporters, and others who spoke truth to the dismally corrupt power of Bill and Hill Clinton's political machine -- some at risk to their careers, others at risk to their lives. A few points to note:

- Those corporatist media reporters who attempted to report the story often found themselves muzzled; some even lost their jobs. The only major dailies that consistently handled the story well were the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Times.

- Nobody on this list has gotten rich and many you may not have even heard of. Taking on the Clintons typically has not been a happy or rewarding experience. At least ten reporters have been fired, transferred off their beats, resigned, or otherwise gotten into trouble because of their work on the scandals. Whistleblowing is even less appreciated within the government. One study of whistleblowers found that 232 out of 233 them reported suffering retaliation; another study found reprisals in about 95% of cases.

- Contrary to the popular impression, the politics of those listed ranges from the left to the right, and from the ideological to the independent.

PUBLIC OFFICIALS

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ was a prosecutor on the staff of Kenneth Starr. His attempts to uncover the truth in the Vincent Foster death case were repeatedly foiled and he was the subject of planted stories undermining his credibility and implying that he was unstable. Rodriguez eventually resigned.

JEAN DUFFEY: Head of a joint federal-county drug task force in Arkansas. Her first instructions from her boss: "Jean, you are not to use the drug task force to investigate any public official." Duffey's work, however, led deep into the heart of the Dixie Mafia, including members of the Clinton machine and the investigation of the so-called "train deaths." Ambrose Evans-Pritchard reports that when she produced a star witness who could testify to Clinton's involvement with cocaine, the local prosecuting attorney, Dan Harmon issued a subpoena for all the task force records, including "the incriminating files on his own activities. If Duffey had complied it would have exposed 30 witnesses and her confidential informants to violent retributions. She refused." Harmon issued a warrant for her arrest and friendly cops told her that there was a $50,000 price on her head. She eventually fled to Texas. The once-untouchable Harmon was later convicted of racketeering, extortion and drug dealing.

BILL DUNCAN: An IRS investigator in Arkansas who drafted some 30 federal indictments of Arkansas figures on money laundering and other charges. Clinton biographer Roger Morris quotes a source who reviewed the evidence: "Those indictments were a real slam dunk if there ever was one." The cases were suppressed, many in the name of "national security." Duncan was never called to testify. Other IRS agents and state police disavowed Duncan and turned on him. Said one source, "Somebody outside ordered it shut down and the walls went up."

RUSSELL WELCH: An Arkansas state police detective working with Duncan. Welch developed a 35-volume, 3,000 page archive on drug and money laundering operations at Mena. His investigation was so compromised that a high state police official even let one of the targets of the probe look through the file. At one point, Welch was sprayed in the face with poison, later identified by the Center for Disease Control as anthrax. He would write in his diary, "I feel like I live in Russia, waiting for the secret police to pounce down. A government has gotten out of control. Men find themselves in positions of power and suddenly crimes become legal." Welch is no longer with the state police.

DAN SMALTZ: Smaltz did an outstanding job investigating and prosecuting charges involving illegal payoffs to Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy, yet was treated with disparaging and highly inaccurate reporting by the likes of the David Broder and the NY Times. Espy was acquitted under a law that made it necessary to not only prove that he accepted gratuities but that he did something specific in return. On the other hand, Tyson Foods copped a plea in the same case, paying $6 million in fines and serving four years' probation. The charge: that Tyson had illegally offered Espy $12,000 in airplane rides, football tickets and other payoffs. In the Espy investigation, Smaltz obtained 15 convictions and collected over $11 million in fines and civil penalties. Offenses for which convictions were obtained included false statements, concealing money from prohibited sources, illegal gratuities, illegal contributions, falsifying records, interstate transportation of stolen property, money laundering, and illegal receipt of USDA subsidies. Incidentally, Janet Reno blocked Smaltz from pursuing leads aimed at allegations of major drug trafficking in Arkansas and payoffs to the then governor of the state, WJ Clinton. Espy had become Ag secretary only after being flown to Arkansas to get the approval of chicken king Don Tyson.

DAVID SCHIPPERS was House impeachment counsel and a Chicago Democrat. He did a highly creditable job but since he didn't fit the right-wing conspiracy theory, the Clintonista media downplayed his work. Thus most Americans don't know that he told NewsMax, "Let me tell you, if we had a chance to put on a case, I would have put live witnesses before the committee. But the House leadership, and I'm not talking about Henry Hyde, they just killed us as far as time was concerned. I begged them to let me take it into this year. Then I screamed for witnesses before the Senate. But there was nothing anybody could do to get those Senators to show any courage. They told us essentially, you're not going to get 67 votes so why are you wasting our time." Schippers also said that while a number of representatives looked at additional evidence kept under seal in a nearby House building, not a single senator did.

JOHN CLARKE: When Patrick Knowlton stopped to relieve himself in Ft. Marcy Park 70 minutes before the discovery of Vince Foster's body, he saw things that got him into deep trouble. His interview statements were falsified and prior to testifying he claims he was overtly harassed by more than a score of men in a classic witness intimidation technique. In some cases there were witnesses. John Clarke has been his dogged lawyer in the witness intimidation case that has been largely ignored by the media, even when the three-judge panel overseeing the Starr investigation permitted Knowlton to append a 20 page addendum to the Starr Report.

OTHER

THE ARKANSAS COMMITTEE: What would later be known as the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy actually began on the left - as a group of progressive students at the University of Arkansas had formed the Arkansas Committee to look into Mena, drugs, money laundering, and Arkansas politics. This committee was the source of some of the important early Clinton stories including those published in the Progressive Review.

CLINTON ADMINISTRATION SCANDALS E-LIST: Moderated by Ray Heizer, this list has been subject to all the idiosyncrasies of Internet bulletin boards, but it has nonetheless proved invaluable to researchers and journalists.

JOURNALISTS

JERRY SEPER of the Washington Times was far and away the best beat reporter of the story, handling it week after week in the best tradition of investigative journalism. If other reporters had followed Seper's lead, the history of the Clintons' machine might have been quite different.

AMBROSE EVANS-PRITCHARD of the London Telegraph did a remarkable job of digging into some of the seamiest tales from Arkansas and the Clinton past. Other early arrivals on the scene were Alexander Cockburn and Jeff Gerth.

CHRISTOPHER RUDDY, among other fine reports on the Clinton scandals, did the best job laying out the facts in the Vince Foster death case.

ROGER MORRIS AND SALLY DENTON wrote a major expose of events at Mena, but at the last moment the Washington Post's brass ordered the story killed. It was published by Penthouse and later included in Morris' "Partners in Power," the best biography of the Clintons.

OTHERS who helped get parts of the story out included reporters Philip Weiss, Carl Limbacher, Wes Phelan, David Bresnahan, William Sammon, Liza Myers, Mara Leveritt, Matt Drudge, Jim Ridgeway, Nat Hentoff, Michael Isikoff, Christopher Hitchens, and Michael Kelly. Also independent investigator Hugh Sprunt and former White House FBI agent Gary Aldrich.

SAM SMITH of the Progressive Review wrote the first book (Shadows of Hope, University of Indiana Press, 1994) deconstructing the Clinton myth and the Review developed a major database on the topic.

The Clintons, to adapt a line from Dr. Johnson, were not only corrupt, they were the cause of corruption in others. Seldom in America have so many come to excuse so much mendacity and malfeasance as during the Clinton years. These rare exceptions cited above, and others unmentioned, deserve our deep thanks.

THE CLINTON LEGACY

The Hidden Election

USA Today calls it "the hidden election," in which nearly 7,000 state legislative seats are decided with only minimal media and public attention. The paper took brief notice because this is the year the state legislatures perform their most important national function: drawing revised congressional districts based on the most recent census.

But there's another important national story here: further evidence of the disaster that Bill Clinton has been for the Democratic Party. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Democrats held a 1,542 seat lead in the state bodies in 1990. As of last November that lead had shrunk to 288. That's a loss of over 1,200 state legislative seats, nearly all of them under Clinton. Across the US, the Democrats control only 65 more state senate seats than the Republicans.

Further, in 1992, the Democrats controlled 17 more state legislatures than the Republicans. After November, the Republicans control one more than the Democrats. Not only is this a loss of 9 legislatures under Clinton, but it is the first time since 1954 that the GOP has controlled more state legislatures than the Democrats (they tied in 1968).

Here's what happened to the Democrats under Clinton, based on our latest figures:

- GOP seats gained in House since Clinton became president: 48

- GOP seats gained in Senate since Clinton became president: 8

- GOP governorships gained since Clinton became president: 11

- GOP state legislative seats gained since Clinton became president: 1,254

as of 1998

- State legislatures taken over by GOP since Clinton became president: 9

- Democrat officeholders who have become Republicans since Clinton became

president: 439 as of 1998

- Republican officeholders who have become Democrats since Clinton became president: 3

NATIONAL CONF OF STATE LEGISLATURES

http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/elect/hstptyct.htm

http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/ele ... re2000.htm

[ChiptBeef]

CVX wrote: sheesh. There are hundreds of photographs of Clinton with the Saudi Royal Family.
Don't fret, CVX. That's just a diversionary tactic. Instead of engaging the debate, reading and writing is put aside so the opposition can have "plausible deniability" by saying the picture is "open to interpretation" and besides, there's no written record to refer to. Kind of like, depends on what the definition of "is" is.

I almost went into fact overdose from your post #11 in this thread. OUTSTANDING! :guitarist :guitarist

[ChiptBeef]

Playing the "extremists" card. Is that the best you've got? That's just plain boring.

[Accountable]

ChiptBeef wrote: Playing the "extremists" card. Is that the best you've got? That's just plain boring. You have just done what you accused Ben & Stupid of doing.



If you disagree with her, argue the merits. Be a man, man.

[ChiptBeef]

Accountable wrote: If you disagree with her, argue the merits. Be a man, man.
The "extremists" tag was unwarranted with no basis in fact. Putting forth political opposition to corruption does not rise to the level of "extremists." If that were the case, all those liberal media elites should be labeled the same. But of course, flopstock and others here are more focused on the politics of personal destruction to be even-handed in their hobby of passing out labels. To infer or say that I have not tried to engage the issues lacks merit and credibility. I am a man. :yh_peace

[Accountable]

Do your research on the Gardeners here. Of those of us who've been here awhile, Flopstock is LEAST likely to deal with personal destruction. Disagreement is not personal destruction.



You set yourself up for attack when you showed yourself to be disengenuous. SCT is a parrot, and Benjamin is pretty extreme, but at least they are genuine and don't try to talk middle of the road and display decidedly left, as you have displayed decidedly right.

[ChiptBeef]

"Opinons vary."

[ChiptBeef]

Phrase used by hunters before and after the kill. Hopefully, that's not a threat. I remember reading something about that being prohibited when I registered. Carry on.

[BabyRider]

ChiptBeef wrote: Phrase used by hunters before and after the kill. Hopefully, that's not a threat. I remember reading something about that being prohibited when I registered. Carry on.
If I may be so rude as to answer for Flops, there is no WAY in hell she would ever threaten someone. Not where you had to ask for clarification, anyway. You'd know it if she was threatening you, and trust me, she's not.

Carrying on. :yh_bigsmi

[Benjamin]

Benjamin is pretty extreme
I'm only extreme in my dislike for the Bush administration. I'm all for an honest debate, but it's impossible to get that from a Bush supporter. It always comes down to: "Well Clinton did blah, blah, blah..." What is the obsession with the Clintons and these lists of petty scandals? I'm surprised the times Bill Clinton farted and picked his nose haven't shown up on some of those lists. The fact is, times were pretty good under Clinton and times are not so good under Bush. The REAL crime during the Clinton administration was the republicans wasting 40 million of our tax dollars trying to dig up some dirt on Clinton. The republicans were with obsessed with trying to bring down a popular democratic president.

On a lighter note, someone has come out with a 100% bipartisan political bumper sticker. The hottest selling bumper sticker comes from New York State: "2008 - RUN HILLARY RUN" Democrats put it on the rear bumper. Republicans put it on the front bumper.

[BabyRider]

Benjamin wrote: I'm only extreme in my dislike for the Bush administration. I'm all for an honest debate, but it's impossible to get that from a Bush supporter.
Just as it's impossible to get from a Clinton supporter. For almost the same reasons.

Benjamin wrote: It always comes down to: "Well Clinton did blah, blah, blah..." What is the obsession with the Clintons and these lists of petty scandals?
Ok, you're joking, here, right? Petty? Seriously?



Benjamin wrote: On a lighter note, someone has come out with a 100% bipartisan political bumper sticker. The hottest selling bumper sticker comes from New York State: "2008 - RUN HILLARY RUN" Democrats put it on the rear bumper. Republicans put it on the front bumper.
Where can I get one of those stickers for my FRONT bumper???

[StupidCowboyTricks]

BabyRider wrote: Just as it's impossible to get from a Clinton supporter. For almost the same reasons.



Ok, you're joking, here, right? Petty? Seriously?





Where can I get one of those stickers for my FRONT bumper???


Maybe your arse?:-3

[StupidCowboyTricks]

SnoozeControl wrote: Ooooh, you're gonna be in so much trouble for that!:D


What? She's gonna have the same line, something about being "F-ing" mad or something? I had a "Baby Rider Moment"

LOL

It's Jay all over again innit? LMAO

[StupidCowboyTricks]

[quote=flopstock]:yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl

Can you possibly get any lamer?



Let me help you out here sherlock...



Source... the world renown liberal website Answers.com

LMAO:wah:

[BabyRider]

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: Maybe your arse?:-3
Since you're the one with the anal-cranium inversion disorder, perhaps you can show me how to attain that position so I can check.



Oh, I'm sorry, big words again: You have your head up your ass.

[ChiptBeef]

ArnoldLayne wrote: You seem to have put your self in a position where you are fighting them off from all directions. Hardly suprising then you feel like prey :wah:
I agree with you and Arron Tippin, "You've got to stand for something, or you'll fall for anything." I can handle the threats and arrows. I try to wear God's armor every chance I get.

[ChiptBeef]

Many liberals have argued that we should stop paying attention to the Clinton scandals since they have been out of the presidency for 5 years. I do not find that argument credible based on the recent reports regarding Hillary Clinton. An Internet report posted on 1/7/06 and updated on 1/8/06 shows that Hillary Clinton is again embroiled in a serious scandal. It doesn't get any more current than that.

Source: "Hillary Clinton's Former Campaign Finance Director Indicted" http://www.wnbc.com/politics/4063107/detail.html

Only time will tell if the main-stream media covers this scandal as closely and extensively as the scandal surrounding former House Majority Leader Tom Delay. One can imagine the coverage would be as, or more extensive, given Clinton's prior role in the White House and her current role in the Senate.

[ChiptBeef]

It seems the story might be getting slight coverage.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006 ... 4148.shtml



Thankfully, others have been following the scandal for some time.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/ under "Hilliary Watch 2006"

[ChiptBeef]

Harriet Miers was president Bush's nominee for the Supreme court in October 2005 and is serving as White House Counsel. She contributed to Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2000. I wonder if that will play a role in Hillary's current FEC scandal surrounding campaign cotributions from that same period. After all, Tom Delay's name was mentioned. That should be enough for a formal investigation.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=46744

[ChiptBeef]

A good look at Billary's track record.

"A Few Of Hillary Clinton's Greatest Hits"

http://prorev.com/hillary.htm