Another Kennedy Scandal?

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:23 pm

The Boston Herald is reporting Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) has a "secret love child." Is this credible? Can Ted Kennedy afford another scandal? Is this hypocritical, based on Mr. Kennedy's flogging of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito within the past two weeks about his past?

Note: The Boston Herald has been owned by Patrick Purcell as an independent newspaper since 1994.

http://thetrack.bostonherald.com/moreTr ... eid=121772

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:29 pm

going to be cautious what i say here, but i was one of 17 Mass. trial court law librarians, and a DA investigator. ...teddy was a joke to all of us who knew him. who cares about another scandal however, he has the money and name to protect him, and a blonde in every pond. i do have a photo however, of his naked butt waving in the air over some female in a dinghy off hyannisport.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:46 pm

lady cop wrote: going to be cautious what i say here, but i was one of 17 Mass. trial court law librarians, and a DA investigator. ...teddy was a joke to all of us who knew him. who cares about another scandal however, he has the money and name to protect him, and a blonde in every pond. i do have a photo however, of his naked butt waving in the air over some female in a dinghy off hyannisport.
I appreciate that. I spent a couple years in Chatham during the 1980's and heard the rampant Kennedy rumors. This story seems to have legs, based on the Herald's reporting. You have a good point about the money. It talks, for sure. Just please... don't post the picture. :-3

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:50 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: Just please... don't post the picture. :-3i won't, i like living.

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:51 pm

flopstock wrote: What's your point? :-2my point Floops? none really, except he has always been dissolute.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:53 pm

flopstock wrote: What's your point? :-2

I think the point is that there are no real heroes and icons. Every public figure has a soft spot of vulnerability and doesn't walk on water.

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 12:31 am

flopstock wrote: nah, his point... have i been ignoring more juicy rumors while tucked away in the arcade area of the site?

Is there dirt being dished on alito?:-2 Hasn't the guy been an appeals court judge since GWs dad appointed him? And 'now' folks are finding issue with him?

I believe it's because he is being scrutinized for the highest court in the land and the fact that he has been a member of affiliations (that he has listed) he now denies (or can't recall) being a member and the big meanies have the audacity to ask about them, .....it's all Clintons fault you know, how dare them ask him things that made the Mrs. cry...............

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:31 am

Lon wrote: Every public figure has a soft spot of vulnerability and doesn't walk on water.
But some like to swim in it (away from the drowning victim).

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:49 am

ChiptBeef wrote: But some like to swim in it (away from the drowning victim).

and some like to send our troops to war for profit.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:39 am

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: and some like to send our troops to war for profit.
It's hard to keep up with all those Kennedy's. Which one did that?

greydeadhead · Post by **greydeadhead** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:05 am

Oh.. who cares. Everyone knows that the Kennedy clan will never ever own up to anything.. and money does talk... I mean ask the mother of the alleged love child.. oops.. did I say that...

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:31 am

Whatever you do, don't forget that sacred incantation of "alleged." If you do, it might be crucifiction time. Especially where the Kennedy's are concerned. They could just hire someone to do it for them.

greydeadhead · Post by **greydeadhead** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:56 am

Yeah.. my car might accidently go off a bridge somewhere... gasp...

Besides.. I would have to have pity on the kid.. image having to go thru life with Teddy as your father.. hell I would jump off the bridge.. no pushes necessary

911 · Post by **911** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:51 am

EEEWWWWWWWW!

Imagine seeing him nekked. . . . oh my eyes! MY EYES!!!!

:yh_sick

jdubya · Post by **jdubya** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:37 pm

hiccup....he had nothing to do with it.....hiccup....

jdubya · Post by **jdubya** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:38 pm

and after all he did call his political advisors about the girl drowning....he did everything he could, after all, it was time for another cocktail..

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:27 pm

No disrespect to young Mary Jo's memory, but with all the new information on Teddy's Cape Cod escapades, I wonder if she might have been with a "love child" too. Was her autopsy report ever made public? There was so much covered up in that case, it wouldn't surprise me. After all, it's Uncle Teddy. :sneaky:

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:29 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: No disrespect to young Mary Jo's memory, but with all the new information on Teddy's Cape Cod escapades, I wonder if she might have been with a "love child" too. Was her autopsy report ever made public? There was so much covered up in that case, it wouldn't surprise me. After all, it's Uncle Teddy. :sneaky:the boiler room girls had just met. she was not pregnant.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:47 pm

I'd always heard those Kennedy boys made real quick tracks with the ladies.... just not that quick. Thanks for setting that straight. One love child is enough for a lifetime, I'm sure.

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:34 am

It's amazing......Alito is questioned.....and the "well oiled machine" oils up it's lackys.....:wah: -speak to me layman

greydeadhead · Post by **greydeadhead** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:09 am

Sheeesh.. picky picky.. okay Flops... perhaps lust child is a better description..

greydeadhead · Post by **greydeadhead** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:24 am

LOL... good point..

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:30 am

flopstock wrote: What in the hell is a 'love child'? Is that some hippy term?
"Love child" is simply a common phrase that has been used for decades as a more acceptacle version of the specific and pointed term cited below. "Hippy" - now that's a blast from the past. :rolleyes:

From the Webster's New World College Dictionary:

"bastard n. 1 a person born of parents not married to each other; illegitimate child

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:45 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: "Love child" is simply a common phrase that has been used for decades as a more acceptacle version of the specific and pointed term cited below. "Hippy" - now that's a blast from the past. :rolleyes:

From the Webster's New World College Dictionary:

"bastard n. 1 a person born of parents not married to each other; illegitimate child

Your folks weren't married?:-3 -ohhhh my!

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:30 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: Your folks weren't married? ohhhh my!
I was referring to your momma... Billary. :sneaky:

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:58 pm

SnoozeControl wrote: The McCarthy era.:rolleyes:

I hear you.

and with that:

"GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK"

Nite Snooze

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: "GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK"
I heard that's what Ted said to Mary Jo through the window of the Cadillac as he swam away to safety. What a coincidence.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:47 pm

http://news.bostonherald.com/localPolit ... eid=121646

Ted Kennedy resigned from a group in the past few days he said "was basically a fraternal organization" that denied membership to women. Yet he went after Samuel Alito with a battle ax for belonging to an alumni group that Mr. Alito wasn't even active in, other than receiving their magazine. Ted Kennedy... hypocrite.

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:14 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: http://news.bostonherald.com/localPolit ... eid=121646

Ted Kennedy resigned from a group in the past few days he said "was basically a fraternal organization" that denied membership to women. Yet he went after Samuel Alito with a battle ax for belonging to an alumni group that Mr. Alito wasn't even active in, other than receiving their magazine. Ted Kennedy... hypocrite.

I believe it was about "civil rights"(not much in favor of them) and he used it to garner a position with Ronald Reagan.........you like spin dontcha?

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:16 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: I believe it was about "civil rights"(not much in favor of them) and he used it to garner a position with Ronald Reagan...
Well, that would be yet another Kennedy scandal. I didn't know Kennedy had a post in Regan's cabinet. :-3

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 26, 2006 4:03 am

SnoozeControl wrote: The McCarthy era.:rolleyes:
Come to think of it, Senator Kennedy did kind of sound like Senator McCarthy....

"Mr. Alito, are you now a member, or have you ever been a member, of a college alumni association that routinely sent out magazines to its members? If so, are you now prepared to take an oath of allegiance and renounce your membership to that alumni association?"

:-5 :-5