No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:08 am
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
Christ, Mohammed, Buddha scores of other unknown sages. The secret of there success is that they sought the truth within themselves. They did not rely on outside forces. They were not attached to no institutions, no churches, and no missions. each lifted himself by himself. Christ was not a member of the Christian institutions. Buddha was not a Buddhist, nor Mohammad a Mohommedin. Yet institutions and missions, raise dollars, put up buildings, buy up materiality. such conquest is not spiritual growth. No Spiritual Giant Lives in Numbers. He does not form associations and congregations. He relies on himself.
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
I think I am getting kingsley's number now.........
I thought I knew more than this until I opened my mouth
- AnneBoleyn
- Posts: 6631
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:17 pm
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
Bruv:
think I am getting kingsley's number now.........
You mean he talks at ya, not with ya?
think I am getting kingsley's number now.........
You mean he talks at ya, not with ya?
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
Bruv;1386063 wrote: I think I am getting kingsley's number now.........
I got it on the first post, it's 1929.
I got it on the first post, it's 1929.
- littleCJelkton
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:57 pm
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
I think Christ Mohammed and Buddha maybe followed the 8 I'd rather you didnt's of pastafarianism
I’d really rather you didn’t act like a sanctimonious holier-than-thou ass when describing my noodly goodness. If some people don’t believe in me, that’s okay. Really, I’m not that vain. Besides, this isn’t about them so don’t change the subject.
I’d really rather you didn’t use my existence as a means to oppress, subjugate, punish, eviscerate, and/or, you know, be mean to others. I don’t require sacrifices, and purity is for drinking water, not people.
I’d really rather you didn’t judge people for the way they look, or how they dress, or the way they talk, or, well, just play nice, Okay? Oh, and get this into your thick heads: woman = person. man = person. Sam = Sam. One is not better than the other, unless we’re talking about fashion and I’m sorry, but I gave that to women and some guys who know the difference between teal and fuchsia.
I’d really rather you didn’t indulge in conduct that offends yourself, or your willing, consenting partner of legal age AND mental maturity. As for anyone who might object, I think the expression is go **** yourself, unless they find that offensive in which case they can turn off the TV for once and go for a walk for a change.
I’d really rather you didn’t challenge the bigoted, misogynistic, hateful ideas of others on an empty stomach. Eat, then go after the bitches.
I’d really rather you didn’t build multi million-dollar synagogues/churches/temples/mosques/shrines to my noodly goodness when the money could be better spent (take your pick):
Ending poverty
Curing diseases
Living in peace, loving with passion, and lowering the cost of cable
I might be a complex-carbohydrate omniscient being, but I enjoy the simple things in life. I ought to know. I AM the creator.
I’d really rather you didn’t go around telling people I talk to you. You’re not that interesting. Get over yourself. And I told you to love your fellow man, can’t you take a hint?
I’d really rather you didn’t do unto others as you would have them do unto you if you are into, um, stuff that uses a lot of leather/lubricant/Las Vegas. If the other person is into it, however (pursuant to #4), then have at it, take pictures, and for the love of Mike, wear a CONDOM! Honestly, it’s a piece of rubber. If I didn’t want it to feel good when you did it I would have added spikes, or something.
I’d really rather you didn’t act like a sanctimonious holier-than-thou ass when describing my noodly goodness. If some people don’t believe in me, that’s okay. Really, I’m not that vain. Besides, this isn’t about them so don’t change the subject.
I’d really rather you didn’t use my existence as a means to oppress, subjugate, punish, eviscerate, and/or, you know, be mean to others. I don’t require sacrifices, and purity is for drinking water, not people.
I’d really rather you didn’t judge people for the way they look, or how they dress, or the way they talk, or, well, just play nice, Okay? Oh, and get this into your thick heads: woman = person. man = person. Sam = Sam. One is not better than the other, unless we’re talking about fashion and I’m sorry, but I gave that to women and some guys who know the difference between teal and fuchsia.
I’d really rather you didn’t indulge in conduct that offends yourself, or your willing, consenting partner of legal age AND mental maturity. As for anyone who might object, I think the expression is go **** yourself, unless they find that offensive in which case they can turn off the TV for once and go for a walk for a change.
I’d really rather you didn’t challenge the bigoted, misogynistic, hateful ideas of others on an empty stomach. Eat, then go after the bitches.
I’d really rather you didn’t build multi million-dollar synagogues/churches/temples/mosques/shrines to my noodly goodness when the money could be better spent (take your pick):
Ending poverty
Curing diseases
Living in peace, loving with passion, and lowering the cost of cable
I might be a complex-carbohydrate omniscient being, but I enjoy the simple things in life. I ought to know. I AM the creator.
I’d really rather you didn’t go around telling people I talk to you. You’re not that interesting. Get over yourself. And I told you to love your fellow man, can’t you take a hint?
I’d really rather you didn’t do unto others as you would have them do unto you if you are into, um, stuff that uses a lot of leather/lubricant/Las Vegas. If the other person is into it, however (pursuant to #4), then have at it, take pictures, and for the love of Mike, wear a CONDOM! Honestly, it’s a piece of rubber. If I didn’t want it to feel good when you did it I would have added spikes, or something.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:08 am
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
Little C: I' m glad u agree with me. Hope u get better soon.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:08 am
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
I see u are getting the message Bruv. It takes time!
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:08 am
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
Yzgi :Really, i am not that handsome, but not bad for an 82 year old.
- littleCJelkton
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:57 pm
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
kingsley1929;1386146 wrote: Little C: I' m glad u agree with me. Hope u get better soon.
Get Better?? Well maybe If I try to be worse I won't be better but O.K. ???
Get Better?? Well maybe If I try to be worse I won't be better but O.K. ???
No spiritual giant lives in numbers.
kingsley1929;1386147 wrote: I see u are getting the message Bruv. It takes time!
I don't think I have that long
I don't think I have that long
I thought I knew more than this until I opened my mouth