Good vs' Evil? Who's good and who's evil?

General discussion area for all topics not covered in the other forums.
Post Reply
fuzzywuzzy
Posts: 6596
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:35 pm

Good vs' Evil? Who's good and who's evil?

Post by fuzzywuzzy »

Came across this blog and found it very very interesting reading.

Lawful Evil.

"A lawful evil villain methodically takes what he wants within the limits of his code of conduct without regard for whom it hurts. He cares about tradition, loyalty, and order, but not about freedom, dignity, or life.

He plays by the rules but without mercy or compassion. He is comfortable in a hierarchy and would like to rule, but is willing to serve.

He condemns others not according to their actions but according to race, religion, homeland, or social rank.

He is loath to break laws or promises. This reluctance comes partly from his nature and partly because he depends on order to protect himself from those who oppose him on moral grounds.

Some lawful evil villains have particular taboos, such as not killing in cold blood (but having underlings do it) or not letting children come to harm (if it can be helped). They imagine that these compunctions put them above unprincipled villains.

Some lawful evil people and creatures commit themselves to evil with a zeal like that of a crusader committed to good. Beyond being willing to hurt others for their own ends, they take pleasure in spreading evil as an end unto itself. They may also see doing evil as part of a duty to an evil deity or master. Lawful evil represents methodical, intentional, and organized evil."

Lawful Evil | Talking Philosophy

Just wondering if this description reminds you of anyone you know? presidents? historical figures?
User avatar
YZGI
Posts: 11527
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:24 am

Good vs' Evil? Who's good and who's evil?

Post by YZGI »

fuzzywuzzy;1442589 wrote: Came across this blog and found it very very interesting reading.

Lawful Evil.

"A lawful evil villain methodically takes what he wants within the limits of his code of conduct without regard for whom it hurts. He cares about tradition, loyalty, and order, but not about freedom, dignity, or life.

He plays by the rules but without mercy or compassion. He is comfortable in a hierarchy and would like to rule, but is willing to serve.

He condemns others not according to their actions but according to race, religion, homeland, or social rank.

He is loath to break laws or promises. This reluctance comes partly from his nature and partly because he depends on order to protect himself from those who oppose him on moral grounds.

Some lawful evil villains have particular taboos, such as not killing in cold blood (but having underlings do it) or not letting children come to harm (if it can be helped). They imagine that these compunctions put them above unprincipled villains.

Some lawful evil people and creatures commit themselves to evil with a zeal like that of a crusader committed to good. Beyond being willing to hurt others for their own ends, they take pleasure in spreading evil as an end unto itself. They may also see doing evil as part of a duty to an evil deity or master. Lawful evil represents methodical, intentional, and organized evil."

Lawful Evil | Talking Philosophy

Just wondering if this description reminds you of anyone you know? presidents? historical figures?


The obvious answer is Hitler.
fuzzywuzzy
Posts: 6596
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:35 pm

Good vs' Evil? Who's good and who's evil?

Post by fuzzywuzzy »

Hmmmm nope I wouldn't say that ..think more modern. Read the whole article, talks more about it. that's just a small excerpt.
Post Reply

Return to “General Chit Chat”