Government Chemist Tampered With 40,000 Cases, Locking Countless Innocent Americans in Prison | Filming Cops
No I don't believe it's a 'hate' site. Because all the stories are in the mainstream media and and court details and records are also cited.
One thing struck me from reading a few stories and comments on this site. Why do police officers call citizens "civilians" when they themselves are also "civilians?
Hmmm found a new site very interesting.
-
fuzzywuzzy
- Posts: 6596
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:35 pm
Hmmm found a new site very interesting.
three to five years.
She should have to do the time for every single person who is let off because of her meddling.
Yes, there are probably innocent people who were convicted wrongly because of her, but I also suspect there were some good collars that will be wrongly released because of her, as well.
What a mess.
That is just inexcusable
She should have to do the time for every single person who is let off because of her meddling.
Yes, there are probably innocent people who were convicted wrongly because of her, but I also suspect there were some good collars that will be wrongly released because of her, as well.
What a mess.
That is just inexcusable
The home of the soul is the Open Road.
- DH Lawrence
- DH Lawrence
Hmmm found a new site very interesting.
LarsMac;1442830 wrote: three to five years.
She should have to do the time for every single person who is let off because of her meddling.
Yes, there are probably innocent people who were convicted wrongly because of her, but I also suspect there were some good collars that will be wrongly released because of her, as well.
What a mess.
That is just inexcusable
Her motive is given as helping the prosecutors to get a conviction and you're worried about the guilty ones who will be wrongly freed?
The original samples are still there and will be retested before any judicial review - if they were originally guilty then they will still be guilty - how's about the lives destroyed by her, not only the convicted but also their wives and children, innocents all.
Three to five years is an insult to them and their suffering.
She should have to do the time for every single person who is let off because of her meddling.
Yes, there are probably innocent people who were convicted wrongly because of her, but I also suspect there were some good collars that will be wrongly released because of her, as well.
What a mess.
That is just inexcusable
Her motive is given as helping the prosecutors to get a conviction and you're worried about the guilty ones who will be wrongly freed?
The original samples are still there and will be retested before any judicial review - if they were originally guilty then they will still be guilty - how's about the lives destroyed by her, not only the convicted but also their wives and children, innocents all.
Three to five years is an insult to them and their suffering.
Hmmm found a new site very interesting.
Bryn Mawr;1442840 wrote: Her motive is given as helping the prosecutors to get a conviction and you're worried about the guilty ones who will be wrongly freed?
The original samples are still there and will be retested before any judicial review - if they were originally guilty then they will still be guilty - how's about the lives destroyed by her, not only the convicted but also their wives and children, innocents all.
Three to five years is an insult to them and their suffering.
I am concerned with both. Those were my observations of the whole thing.
But again, We probably look at the thing from a different perspective, too.
I would doubt that all of those "wrongly convicted" because of her activities we "completely innocent" as well.
That, of course, does not justify their convictions.
This woman has single-handed completely screwed up the forensics process for the entire country.
The original samples are still there and will be retested before any judicial review - if they were originally guilty then they will still be guilty - how's about the lives destroyed by her, not only the convicted but also their wives and children, innocents all.
Three to five years is an insult to them and their suffering.
I am concerned with both. Those were my observations of the whole thing.
But again, We probably look at the thing from a different perspective, too.
I would doubt that all of those "wrongly convicted" because of her activities we "completely innocent" as well.
That, of course, does not justify their convictions.
This woman has single-handed completely screwed up the forensics process for the entire country.
The home of the soul is the Open Road.
- DH Lawrence
- DH Lawrence
Hmmm found a new site very interesting.
She only get 3-5 years. She should get life for the amount of peoples lives she has ruined.