Russian politician: US spies slept while Russia elected Trump

[katsung47]

Russian politician: US spies slept while Russia elected Trump

By Zachary Cohen, CNN September 12, 2017

The US government publicly announced in October that it was "confident" Russia orchestrated the hacking of the Democratic National Committee in the lead-up to the election.

And in January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the US intelligence community concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an "influence campaign" aimed at hurting Trump's rival, Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton.

Trump has branded the investigation the "single greatest witch hunt" in political history and consistently questioned the intelligence community's findings well into his presidency.

Clinton 'convinced' there was collusion between Trump aides, Russia

Clinton 'convinced' there was collusion between Trump aides, Russia

Since the election, Trump has appeared to view suggestions of Russian meddling as a Democratic effort to de-legitimize his election win, even though the intelligence community did not conclude that Russian efforts made a difference in the election result.

Russian politician mocks US intel over election - CNNPolitics

[xfrodobagginsx]

Russian didn't elect Trump. There is no evidence that he colluded with the Russians, but there IS Lots of evidence that Hillary colluded with the Russians. She sold them 20% of US Uranium while taking millions of Dollars in donations from them to the Clinton Foundation. Also Bill was paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. Who was colluding? Hillary.

[katsung47]

xfrodobagginsx;1512716 wrote: Russian didn't elect Trump. There is no evidence that he colluded with the Russians, but there IS Lots of evidence that Hillary colluded with the Russians. She sold them 20% of US Uranium while taking millions of Dollars in donations from them to the Clinton Foundation. Also Bill was paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow. Who was colluding? Hillary.


The question is if your words are true, why Trump hasn't use it to attack Clinton? So there is ulterior motive in it.

Truth of 2016 president election

The core is to help Trump to grab the president power.

The mastermind is the FBI.

Russian is only a scapegoat hired to get the thing done.

Clinton is victim but has been targetted by the FBI

Hillary's email was hacked. She is a victim. Russian (or the FBI) is the thief. But in this election the FBI attacked Clinton all the way to help their candidate Trump to steal the president seat.

[xfrodobagginsx]

This thread has been disproven.

[katsung47]

940. The FBI interfere US president election (12/29/2016)



The FBI played an active role to interfere the US 2016 president election. It hit Democrate's nominee Hillary Clinton by email gate to help its candidate Donald Trump. The evident scene was in July 5 during Chilcot report. "FBI Director Comey potentially gave Clinton’s political rivals some ammunition, conceding there was "evidence of mishandling” classified information and that an FBI employee who did the same “would face consequences for this.”

The FBI didn't indict Clinton because they have no evidence that Clinton intended to do wrong with her email setup."(washingtonpost.com) In fact, this is common for others. Powell had done samething. Why they beat the drum this time on Clinton? Because this time the FBI need a candidate of their own to handle a criminal case. So they determined to help Trump to win the election. This was also the time the Feds made a secret deal with Russian to hack Clinton's computer.

So then Trump started to call for Russian's help. Why not China? Because he knew they had a deal with Russia already.

Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

—JULY 27, 2016

https://myaccount.nytimes.com/mobile/lo ... mails.html




What Russian had hacked? Maybe there was something important. Because in President Debate, Trump intimidated his rival hillary that he'd have special prosecutor and "you'd be in jail".

On 10/28, the FBI director Comey reopened Clintion email investigation, then dramatically dropped the investigation on 11/6. A powerful department of the nation so openly, actively interfere in president election is unprecedented.

[xfrodobagginsx]

:yh_sigh Zzzzzzzzz

[xfrodobagginsx]

The CLINTONS Are The Ones Who Were Colluding With The Russians

REPORT: FBI Hid Evidence Tying The Clintons To A Russian Bribery Scheme | Daily Wire

[xfrodobagginsx]

Do you think that Bill and Hillary will be prosecuted for selling 20% of US Uranium to the Russians while taking MILLIONS of dollars into the Clinton Foundation? And then Obama knew about it and did nothing and kept it quiet? Wow!

[xfrodobagginsx]

Interesting how this new revelation is being ignored by the left.

[xfrodobagginsx]

I guess it's been classified by the left as "Not Evidence"

[xfrodobagginsx]

Still Crickets..LOL..This is telling...

[LarsMac]

xfrodobagginsx;1513415 wrote: Do you think that Bill and Hillary will be prosecuted for selling 20% of US Uranium to the Russians while taking MILLIONS of dollars into the Clinton Foundation? And then Obama knew about it and did nothing and kept it quiet? Wow!


That was bull$#!+

You should actually READ the documents from the Iran Nuclear agreement, instead of listening to the right wingnuts.

[katsung47]

xfrodobagginsx;1513391 wrote: The CLINTONS Are The Ones Who Were Colluding With The Russians

REPORT: FBI Hid Evidence Tying The Clintons To A Russian Bribery Scheme | Daily Wire


Trump is a moron. His followers are the same. You mean the Clintons colluding with the Russions to help Trump won the election? If you want to defend trump, find a better story.

. Payment to Russia for hacking in US election (1/4/2017)

Of course, Russia won't do it for free. There must be a secret deal between the intelligence of the two countries. We outsiders can only see it from some facts.

The secret deal: Hacked email were handed to Wikileaks to issue to hit Hillary Clinton.

The payment of secret deal:

1. Aleppo falls (or "liberated" from Russia side) on 12/15. Resistance and civil withdraw from East Aleppo by bus. Five years fight ends. A big victory for Russia and its allies.

2. Economic interest.

Japan pledges 300 bil. yen economic package at Abe-Putin summit

December 17, 2016

The total value of Japan's contribution in investment and loans, including through agreements between private sector firms, is around 300 billion yen ($2.54 billion), Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kotaro Nogami said after the leaders' summit.

http://mainichi.jp/english/articles/201 ... 9f0b9b08b7

Copyright


Putin dismissed the notion that he was only interested in getting economic benefits from Japan.

"If anyone thinks we’re interested only in developing economic links and a peace deal is of secondary importance, that’s not the case," he told the same news conference. That's all for the controversial islands. He went Japan just for those business deals.



You may say that's something between Russia and Japan. The Truth is Japan is the pocket slave of the US. If you still remember Trump claims credit for $50 billion investment by Japanese firm and 7 billion from a Taiwan firm. They were puppet nations that have to pay their defense share that Trump demands. Include that payment to Russia for the US sake.

[xfrodobagginsx]

LarsMac;1513591 wrote: That was bull$#!+

You should actually READ the documents from the Iran Nuclear agreement, instead of listening to the right wingnuts.


Is that why the FBI and the US Government is investigating her? Because there is nothing to see here?

[LarsMac]

xfrodobagginsx;1513619 wrote: Is that why the FBI and the US Government is investigating her? Because there is nothing to see here?


Typical right wingnut response.

if you want to discuss the Iran Nuclear agreement, go read the document, first, so that you may actually know what you are talking about.

If all you want to do is wallow in the right wingnut conspiracy BS, then, have a nice swim.

[Ahso!]

Trump may prove to be the worst US president in history, and that's saying something considering Regan and the Bushes are difficult to beat for that dubious honor.

That said, the entire Russian collusion thing appears bogus to me.

Did Russia want to sway the 2016 election? You bet they did - they always have in every election. It's in their interest to do so and they'd be incompetent as leaders if they didn't. The US tries to sway every election in every country. As does every country.

However, if anyone can invent bs charges for something, Robert Mueller can. He had lots to do with masterminding the lead-up to the Iraq invasion. BS of all BS! The man is a genius as a BSer.

[xfrodobagginsx]

LarsMac;1513634 wrote: Typical right wingnut response.

if you want to discuss the Iran Nuclear agreement, go read the document, first, so that you may actually know what you are talking about.

If all you want to do is wallow in the right wingnut conspiracy BS, then, have a nice swim.


Conspiracies aren't based on the facts. They are speculative. The facts didn't take you to Trump, they took you to Hillary and yet you won't believe it.

[katsung47]

942. How the FBI helps Donald Trump (1/11/2017)



Trump is the candidate of the FBI. He from the beginning knew the secret deal of email hacking between the FBI and Russian secret police.



Though Trump said hacking had ‘no effect on the outcome of the election’. He can not explain why he

Called on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails.

By ASHLEY PARKER and DAVID E. SANGER JULY 27, 2016



“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference



http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/po ... .html?_r=0


The unusual friendship manifested in his tweet that Putin has been praised for many times as being smart and being admired and respected.

The fact that Russian were paid with war interest and economic interest after Trump being elected US president. (see #941)

The fact that Putin remains inaction after President Obama retaliating Russia's hacking with new sanction and diplomats' expelling. (Putin says he is waiting for Trump's administration.)

All these proved there was a secret deal that Russian hacked US in election to the order of Trump and his master.

Trump also was helped by the FBI in following fields.



1. S.S.G. rally. It's a nation wide informants net. A resource controlled by the Feds. (see #901)



2. Cyber space team, especially in face book. Combine with the fake news created by the disinformation office, they waged a wave in internet community to support Trump and tarnish Clinton.



3. Media. See #924. "Harvard Study Confirms The Media Tore Down Clinton, Built Up Trump And Sanders

by Carter Maness".

[xfrodobagginsx]

LarsMac;1513634 wrote: Typical right wingnut response.

if you want to discuss the Iran Nuclear agreement, go read the document, first, so that you may actually know what you are talking about.

If all you want to do is wallow in the right wingnut conspiracy BS, then, have a nice swim.


FACT: Obama and Hillary sold 20% of US Uranium to the Russians. FACT: At that same time the Clinton Foundation recieved $150 Million donation from the Russians. FACT: Hillary ran the DNC and paid $6 million dollars to the Russians for dirt on Trump. FACT: Bill Clinton gave a speech in Moscow to the Russians and they gave him 2x his normal speaking fee right after the uranium deal. We now know who was colluding with the Russians. It was Hillary and the DNC. I could have told you that over a year ago.

[katsung47]

Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?



The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve



Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters.

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will

remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

The timing of most of the donations does not match



Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.

Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer, the company’s chairman:

His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.

The timing of Telfer’s donations might be questionable if there was reason to believe that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in the approval of the deal with Russia, but all the evidence points to the contrary — that Clinton did not play a pivotal role, and, in fact, may not have played any role at all.

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton- ... ssia-deal/

[xfrodobagginsx]

katsung47;1514714 wrote: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?



The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve



Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters.

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will

remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

The timing of most of the donations does not match



Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.

Of the remaining individuals connected with Uranium One who donated to the Clinton Foundation, only one was found to have contributed during the same time frame that the deal was taking place, according to The New York Times — Ian Telfer, the company’s chairman:

His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.

The timing of Telfer’s donations might be questionable if there was reason to believe that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in the approval of the deal with Russia, but all the evidence points to the contrary — that Clinton did not play a pivotal role, and, in fact, may not have played any role at all.

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton- ... ssia-deal/


IT WAS up to her and OBAMA and the bipassed congressional approval. That's criminal. Plus, she recieved a handsome $150 MiLLION donation to the Clinton Foundation, plus, Bill got 2x his speaking fee for his speech in Moscow.

[katsung47]

xfrodobagginsx;1514744 wrote: IT WAS up to her and OBAMA and the bipassed congressional approval. That's criminal. Plus, she recieved a handsome $150 MiLLION donation to the Clinton Foundation, plus, Bill got 2x his speaking fee for his speech in Moscow.


If that's criminal, Hillary would have been prosecuted already. It's just your personal hatred.

Russia Wanted Trump As President And It Got Him. Now What Does America Do?

,HuffPost• November 22, 2017

On Jan. 6, 2017, the U.S. intelligence community released a declassified version of its analysis finding that Russian President Vladimir Putin had not only interfered in the 2016 election, but had actively tried to help Trump. Among the tools Russia used was the theft of emails from the campaign of Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, and their release through Russia-friendly WikiLeaks.

Trump campaign foreign policy aide George Papadopoulos detailed in filings associated with his guilty plea agreement how Russians in April 2016 were offering the campaign emails damaging to Clinton. Emails between the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and a former business partner show that the younger Trump was eager to see the supposedly incriminating information in advance of a Trump Tower meeting. Trump Jr. later traded messages with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about his father’s exploitation of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. On Oct. 12, 2016, after Assange suggested that the GOP nominee help publicize the latest batch of stolen emails, Trump himself sent a tweet praising WikiLeaks just 15 minutes later.

On May 9, 2017, after three months of complaining about the FBI’s Russia probe, Trump fired the agency’s director, James Comey. The reason initially stated was that Comey had mishandled an investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. But the very next day, Trump reportedly told Russia’s foreign minister and its U.S. ambassador during an Oval Office visit that he’d fired Comey to block the probe. Trump again cited the Russia investigation as a reason for firing Comey in an interview with NBC News on May 11. That firing led quickly to Mueller’s appointment to take over the investigation.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-wante ... 30401.html

[xfrodobagginsx]

katsung47;1515389 wrote: If that's criminal, Hillary would have been prosecuted already. It's just your personal hatred.

Russia Wanted Trump As President And It Got Him. Now What Does America Do?

,HuffPost• November 22, 2017

On Jan. 6, 2017, the U.S. intelligence community released a declassified version of its analysis finding that Russian President Vladimir Putin had not only interfered in the 2016 election, but had actively tried to help Trump. Among the tools Russia used was the theft of emails from the campaign of Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, and their release through Russia-friendly WikiLeaks.

Trump campaign foreign policy aide George Papadopoulos detailed in filings associated with his guilty plea agreement how Russians in April 2016 were offering the campaign emails damaging to Clinton. Emails between the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and a former business partner show that the younger Trump was eager to see the supposedly incriminating information in advance of a Trump Tower meeting. Trump Jr. later traded messages with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about his father’s exploitation of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. On Oct. 12, 2016, after Assange suggested that the GOP nominee help publicize the latest batch of stolen emails, Trump himself sent a tweet praising WikiLeaks just 15 minutes later.

On May 9, 2017, after three months of complaining about the FBI’s Russia probe, Trump fired the agency’s director, James Comey. The reason initially stated was that Comey had mishandled an investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. But the very next day, Trump reportedly told Russia’s foreign minister and its U.S. ambassador during an Oval Office visit that he’d fired Comey to block the probe. Trump again cited the Russia investigation as a reason for firing Comey in an interview with NBC News on May 11. That firing led quickly to Mueller’s appointment to take over the investigation.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-wante ... 30401.html


No, should wouldn't have. There is mass corruption in the FBI and the Government and they are being exposed now and I suspect people are going to be losing their jobs and or being prosecuted. Clinton and the Democrats paid $10 Million to the RUSSIANS for dirt on Trump. That's a fact. THEY are the ones who colluded.

[katsung47]

Trump and Pence were warned in January that CIA had proof Putin directed election hacks: report

Travis Gettys 14 DEC 2017

But the Washington Post reported Thursday that Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., CIA Director John Brennan and FBI Director James B. Comey met with Trump on Jan. 6 to report the CIA “had captured Putin’s specific instructions on the operation.”

The officials had already briefed President Barack Obama and members of Congress about the intercepts, and they expected the president-elect to throw them out of Trump Tower.



https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/trump- ... ks-report/

[xfrodobagginsx]

If there is no left wing bias, why isn't the FBI investigating Hillary, Obama and the DNC?

[LarsMac]

xfrodobagginsx;1515941 wrote: If there is no left wing bias, why isn't the FBI investigating Hillary, Obama and the DNC?


They did. They didn't find anything that was actually criminal.

[xfrodobagginsx]

LarsMac;1515945 wrote: They did. They didn't find anything that was actually criminal.


Yes they did and they admitted it under oath, but then Comey dismissed it because Comey is helping Hillary and the Democrats.

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1515999 wrote: Yes they did and they admitted it under oath, but then Comey dismissed it because Comey is helping Hillary and the Democrats.


Could you give us a link to that?

[xfrodobagginsx]

Bryn Mawr;1516375 wrote: Could you give us a link to that?


Sure here you go:

Hillary Clinton and the real Russian collusion | Fox News

[katsung47]

The Secret Correspondence Between Donald Trump Jr. and WikiLeaks

The transparency organization asked the president’s son for his cooperation—in sharing its work, in contesting the results of the election, and in arranging for Julian Assange to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.



Peter Nicholls / Reuters

JULIA IOFFE NOV 13, 2017

The messages, obtained by The Atlantic, were also turned over by Trump Jr.’s lawyers to congressional investigators. They are part of a long—and largely one-sided—correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son that continued until at least July 2017. The messages show WikiLeaks, a radical transparency organization that the American intelligence community believes was chosen by the Russian government to disseminate the information it had hacked, actively soliciting Trump Jr.’s cooperation. WikiLeaks made a series of increasingly bold requests, including asking for Trump’s tax returns, urging the Trump campaign on Election Day to reject the results of the election as rigged, and requesting that the president-elect tell Australia to appoint Julian Assange ambassador to the United States.

........



WikiLeaks played a pivotal role in the presidential campaign. In July 2016, on the first day of the Democratic National Convention, WikiLeaks released emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee's servers that spring. The emails showed DNC officials denigrating Bernie Sanders, renewing tensions on the eve of Clinton’s acceptance of the nomination. On October 7, less than an hour after the Washington Post released the Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump bragged about sexually assaulting women, Wikileaks released emails that hackers had pilfered from the personal email account of Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... ks/545738/

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1516397 wrote: Sure here you go:

Hillary Clinton and the real Russian collusion | Fox News


So the first warning flag is FOx News but let's go beyond that and see where the book they reference comes from.

Published by the Government Accountability Institute, OK, who are they?

Set up and run by two serving officers of Breitbart News, OK, who are they?



Breitbart News Network (known commonly as Breitbart News, Breitbart or Breitbart.com) is a far-right[6] American news, opinion and commentary[7][8] website founded in 2007 by conservative commentator Andrew Breitbart. The site has published a number of falsehoods and conspiracy theories,[9][10][11][12] as well as intentionally misleading stories.[13] Its journalists are ideologically driven, and some of its content has been called misogynist, xenophobic and racist.[14]




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breitbart_News

OK, next!

[xfrodobagginsx]

Bryn Mawr;1516506 wrote: So the first warning flag is FOx News but let's go beyond that and see where the book they reference comes from.

Published by the Government Accountability Institute, OK, who are they?

Set up and run by two serving officers of Breitbart News, OK, who are they?



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breitbart_News

OK, next!


So are you saying that this report is false?

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1516533 wrote: So are you saying that this report is false?


It's written by the Editor in Chief of Breitbart, an organisation known not to let the truth get in the way of their political agenda so, while I do not know for a certainty that it is false I do know that it is totally unreliable as a source of information.

[xfrodobagginsx]

Bryn Mawr;1516551 wrote: It's written by the Editor in Chief of Breitbart, an organisation known not to let the truth get in the way of their political agenda so, while I do not know for a certainty that it is false I do know that it is totally unreliable as a source of information.


Which facts did he give that are false?

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1516582 wrote: Which facts did he give that are false?


Bryn Mawr;1516551 wrote: It's written by the Editor in Chief of Breitbart, an organisation known not to let the truth get in the way of their political agenda so, while I do not know for a certainty that it is false I do know that it is totally unreliable as a source of information.


Please read what I said, I did not claim to know for certain that any particular "facts" were untrue, just that it was totally unreliable as a source of information..

[xfrodobagginsx]

Bryn Mawr;1516586 wrote: Please read what I said, I did not claim to know for certain that any particular "facts" were untrue, just that it was totally unreliable as a source of information..


Which sources would you believe? Only Liberally biased ones right? That refuse to report anything that contradicts their agenda.

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1516684 wrote: Which sources would you believe? Only Liberally biased ones right? That refuse to report anything that contradicts their agenda.


For a start, sources that document their sources of information and that can be cross linked to other reliable sources of data.

Oh, and sources that are not known for deliberately producing false and misleading reports.

[xfrodobagginsx]

Bryn Mawr;1516771 wrote: For a start, sources that document their sources of information and that can be cross linked to other reliable sources of data.

Oh, and sources that are not known for deliberately producing false and misleading reports.


Then you won't believe CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and the other liberal sources because they do produce false and misleading reports on a daily basis and they ignore any story that contradicts their agenda.

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1516774 wrote: Then you won't believe CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and the other liberal sources because they do produce false and misleading reports on a daily basis and they ignore any story that contradicts their agenda.


Thankfully I don't come across any of those in my daily reading.

[xfrodobagginsx]

Bryn Mawr;1516776 wrote: Thankfully I don't come across any of those in my daily reading.


Which sources do you use?

[Bryn Mawr]

xfrodobagginsx;1516824 wrote: Which sources do you use?


BBC, Wikitribune, Reuters, Associated Press, Financial Times, ...

[katsung47]

Bannon Calls Donald Trump Jr.'s Meeting with Russian Lawyer 'Treasonous' and 'Unpatriotic'

Yahoo View•January 2, 2018

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bannon-calls ... 00793.html




Such a case would be a big crime if applied on Hillary, but Bannon has to apologize because the Feds(FBI) is behind Trump.

[katsung47]

971. Secret deal behind Russian's email hacking (7/22/2017)

Trump called Russians to hack Clinton's emails. He says now he didn't know Russians hacking deal. What was his base to call Russian to hack Clinton's email? Idea dropped from the sky?

'Treason'? Critics savage Trump over Russia hack comments

By NAHAL TOOSI and SEUNG MIN KIM 07/27/2016

Donald Trump's call on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails has shocked, flabbergasted and appalled lawmakers and national security experts across the political spectrum, with one saying it was "tantamount to treason."

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/t ... son-226303


Of course, Russian wouldn't give a free service. Six months later, Aleppo fell. A first payment to Russia after Trump won the president campaign. Rebel retreated in order. That was an arranged deal.

Aleppo: Evacuations resume after buses set ablaze

CNN December 18, 20

As many as 9,000 people had been evacuated from eastern Aleppo in nine convoys on Thursday and Friday


The full deal is done one year later. Tillerson's words means "Now we fulfill the deal. Syria is yours".

US Secretary of State says 'Syria's fate is in Russian hands now'

The Independent• July 3, 2017

The US Secretary of State has reportedly told the United Nations Secretary General that he thinks the fate of Syria and its leader is now up to Russia.

Rex Tillerson held a private meeting with Antonio Guterres at the State Department when he said the US was limiting its mission to defeating terror group Isis, according to Foreign Policy.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-secretary ... 27145.html


Trump and Putin's Syria Ceasefire Effectively Lets Assad Off the Hook

Time July 10, 2017

Observers and former U.S. officials say the ceasefire deal effectively guarantees Assad’s regime remains in place, in spite of Trump administration rhetoric to the contrary.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-putin- ... 37133.html


Meanwhile, US had a missile attack on Syria in the name that Syria had a chemical weapon violation, that was a cover up operation of the secret deal.

[katsung47]

Senate panel to release interviews with Trump Jr., others involved in meeting with Russian lawyer

By Karoun Demirjian January 25 at 2:22 PM

The Senate Judiciary Committee intends to release transcripts of its interviews with President Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr., and others who participated in a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer allegedly promising damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpos ... nal&wpmk=1


For some reason they delay the releasing.

[katsung47]

Special counsel indicts 13 Russian nationals in Russia investigation

Good Morning America Good Morning AmericaFebruary 16, 2018



The Justice Department on Friday indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian groups of violating criminal laws with the intent to interfere "with U.S. elections and political processes", according to the agency.

The indictment depicts an elaborate scheme in which some of the Russians accused allegedly came to the U.S. with the deliberate intention of undermining the American political and electoral process, including the 2016 presidential election.



https://www.yahoo.com/gma/special-couns ... ories.html

[xfrodobagginsx]

Those Russian Nationals were sent to create discord in the American Election. They were sent in 2014 when Obama was in office AND before Trump even ran for President. They supported Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. They were in no way connected to Trump and they did not affect the outcome of the election.

Hillary and Obama on the other hand DID collude with the Russians. Hillary paid $15 Million dollars to the Russians for dirt on Trump. The Russians Also donated $145 Million to the Clinton Foundation at the same time that Hillary and Obama sold 20% of US Uranium to Russia.

The FBI agents even admitted that there is no evidence on Trump. The emails indicate that they knew that Hillary wouldn't be charged with her crimes of deleting emails even before the investigation was complete. Corruption is on the left.

[xfrodobagginsx]

Jobless claims in US are at lowest since 1969. Still think Capitalism doesn't work? Really Trump is KILLING it! Socialism does not work. I told you.



https://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-jo ... 2018-03-01

[katsung47]

xfrodobagginsx;1517956 wrote: Those Russian Nationals were sent to create discord in the American Election. They were sent in 2014 when Obama was in office AND before Trump even ran for President. They supported Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. They were in no way connected to Trump and they did not affect the outcome of the election.

Hillary and Obama on the other hand DID collude with the Russians. Hillary paid $15 Million dollars to the Russians for dirt on Trump. The Russians Also donated $145 Million to the Clinton Foundation at the same time that Hillary and Obama sold 20% of US Uranium to Russia.

The FBI agents even admitted that there is no evidence on Trump. The emails indicate that they knew that Hillary wouldn't be charged with her crimes of deleting emails even before the investigation was complete. Corruption is on the left.


DOJ Report To Knock Trump's Favorite FBI Foil Over Leak That Helped Trump's Own Campaign

HuffPost

Ryan J. Reilly,HuffPost• March 4, 2018

WASHINGTON ? The Justice Department’s top oversight official is set to release a report slamming an FBI official President Donald Trump has portrayed as a Hillary Clinton stooge — for allegedly authorizing leaks of information that hurt Clinton’s campaign.

Trump and his supporters have used the fact that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s wife ran for a state Senate seat as a Democrat to paint him as a Democratic partisan out to get Trump. Despite irrefutable evidence that the bureau’s public actions before the election actually hurt Clinton, Trump defenders on Capitol Hill and on Fox News have spun up a narrative alleging that the FBI leaked information ahead of the election to damage Trump.

The long-anticipated report from the Justice Department’s inspector general ? likely to be released this month or next ? could further undermine that already ridiculous claim. Trump and his allies have suggested that McCabe leaked information that hurt Trump and helped Clinton. But the IG’s forthcoming report is set to reveal the opposite: McCabe authorized leaks that damaged Clinton and aided Trump.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/doj-report-k ... 46281.html

[katsung47]

The Key Players In Trump’s ‘Deep State’ Conspiracy Theory Are All Republicans

By Ryan J. Reilly and Jessica Schulberg 02/01/2018

WASHINGTON — The key law enforcement figures in what President Donald Trump and his allies have characterized as a “deep state” conspiracy against him are not lefties or even Democrats: They are Republicans. And Trump picked a number of them himself.

Trump and Republicans are continuing to attack the nation’s top law enforcement organizations to undermine the special counsel investigation into his campaign, which has already resulted in criminal charges against four Trump associates. But factually speaking, it’s really tough for Trump backers to credibly argue that the deck has been stacked against the president, simply based on the political leanings of the key figures in the case.



https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tr ... il__020218

[katsung47]

1005. News proves my opinion is very correct (2/16/2018)



On 1/27 in (1,002) about the (anti Trump) text of FBI agents Strzok and Page I wrote:

I think that is done by the real "secret society" of the FBI.

1. Everybody has his own politic view. So do Strzok and Page. Must they have to support Donald Trump? Did they commit any crime in that Trump Russian gate investigation team?

2. It's more like a sting project as the FBI used to do. Strzok and Page could be false flag embedded in that team to sabotage "anti-Trump" plot. They were monitored. Their email were intercepted. As I know the culture of the FBI is anti-Clinton, and Trump is their representative. see #930.

3. The articles is to cut relationship between Trump and the FBI when Trump became notorious that he won the election by the help of Russians.

4. It's another style to apply pressure on the FBI to finish the Kat Sung's case.See #902.

"Now they want Donald Trump to take care of the situation of economic collapse in coming years. The main job is to cover up the murder case - to kill Kat Sung, his relatives and people who know this story. That is the core interest of the Feds for which they have paid so much to China. see new secret deal at :"899. April plot (3/29/2016)"."

Four days later, a news article proves my opinion is very correct.

FBI Agent Trump Accused Of 'Treason' Wrote Letter That Helped Get Trump Elected

Paige Lavender,HuffPost• January 31, 2018

WASHINGTON ? FBI agent Peter Strzok helped draft a letter that, in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign, signaled the re-opening of a probe into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails, CNN reported Wednesday.

Strzok is one of the FBI agents whom some Republicans have accused of scheming to undermine President Donald Trump ahead of the 2016 election. He worked on both the Clinton probe as well as the Russia probe when it was in its early stages, and later joined special counsel Robert Mueller’s team.

The letter Strzok helped draft, sent to Congress by then-FBI Director James Comey on Oct. 28 ? days ahead of the 2016 election ? dealt a blow to Clinton, whom Trump repeatedly attacked for using a personal email while serving as secretary of state. Comey penned another letter just before the election saying no new relevant information was found, and stood by the FBI’s prior decision not to recommend charges


https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-agent-tr ... 23734.html

The reality is Strzok took part in the operation to re-open the investigation on Hillary ten days before the voting date that helped Trump to win the election.

The reality is Strzok's text with Page are now used by Trump to attack Mueller's team that investigating him.