ForumGarden

nickols_k

Ted;912448 wrote: According to the scholars the #666 refers to Nero.

Shalom

Ted:-6

666 is just a number which doesn't relate to numerology

nickols_k

K.Snyder;910947 wrote: The truth about 666 is that it's one above 665 and one less than 667...

Yes, of course!

nickols_k

<t>Daniyal;910659 wrote: So your saying you don't know where the teaching of the qur'aan come from Yes ? 
 
 
 
Nor do you know who the Anti-Christ is Yes ? 
 
 
I'm AntiChrist who is not from islam! 
 
That speaks AntiChrist, who was born to be free! Who was ...

nickols_k

<t>Daniyal;910625 wrote: I Have Two Question If I May . 
 
 
 
Where Did The Qur'aan Get It's Teaching From ? 
 
Who Is The Anti - Christ ? 
 
 
I'm AntiChrist and I'm not preacher of quran 
 
That speaks AntiChrist, who was born to be free! Who was ...

nickols_k

<t>Daniyal;910502 wrote: 
 
Their GOAL . Is To Monitor And Control All Personal Activities . The New Money System Marks The Money For The People . The Mark Will Be A Bar Code , And The Number Will Be 666 . The Combination Of The Bar Code And 666 Will Be An Integral Part Of The 666 System ...

nickols_k

double helix;786171 wrote: This was the most entertaining thread I have read today. What does that say for me? no, I doon't want toooo know.

Thanks for your opinion!

nickols_k

<t>Ted;785972 wrote: nickolas k:-6 
 
When we go to both the OT and the NT the words translated as faith meant trust in the original. They were not talking about a belief in a set of doctrine or dogma. 
 
Shalom 
 
Ted:-6 
 
 
I'm not preacher of TRUST or FAITH ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;785118 wrote: nicholas k 
 
I have no problem with that. If that is what you believe that is fine with me. 
 
I think that you are mistaking the word faith as a body of belief. The ancient words translated into faith mean "Trust". 
 
Shalom 
 
Ted:-6 
<br ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;780522 wrote: nickols k:-6 
 
If that is what you wish to believe then go for it. 
 
Shalom 
 
Ted:-6 
 
 
It seems that you are mistaking the faith with the knowledge! I don't belive in exiastance of lake of fire but I know that lake of fire exists ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;774774 wrote: nichols k:-6 
 
A great majority of scholars around the world accept the historicity of one Jesus of Nazareth. There is no doubt in their minds. 
 
For me, I have had the experiential reality of the risen Lord. 
 
If you wish to believe that the lake of ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;774494 wrote: nickols k:-6 
 
The lake of fire is a metaphor. It does not and will not exist in reality. It is pure myth. 
 
 
Lake of fire is reality and more than drmatic for some people! I saw lake of fire personally. Do you believe me? 
 
 
 
No, I ...

nickols_k

Saved from lake of fire for eternal life!

Lucifer is not illusion but he is creature but not fruit of mental mind! It seems that you mix he with egregor!

Blessed be!

nickols_k

<t>Ted;773033 wrote: nickols k:-6 
 
The original canon as it exists today was established in about 375 at one of the counsels. Since that time there have been many translations into many languages. There were some disputes about the "Apocrypha" so some Bibles include it and some do not. The ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;772328 wrote: nichols k 
 
I can agree that many do not read the Bible critically. However, that does not destroy the validity of the message. 
 
I cannot agree with your comment that the Bible has no "energy" whatever that means. If it has had no "energy" than why has it been ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;771780 wrote: nickols k:-6 
 
The first question I would have to ask is what do you mean by a lie? How would that apply to the Bible? Give me an example. 
Many people accept all information of Bible as dogma without evidences of its rightenousness. They thing that declaration ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;770432 wrote: nickols k:-6 
 
I find it rather interesting that you consider the Bible wrongly translated when thousands of scholarly people completely disagree. I don'T think so. 
 
Prophets were speaking of their own time and not some time in the distant future. B. W ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;769880 wrote: nickols k:-6 
 
I do not put the Bible first. I put my relationship with God first. 
 
The Bible is a very human book written by humans. Nevertheless, God does speak to us through the very human words of the Bible. 
 
As to whether or not you are a ...

nickols_k

<t>JAB;769797 wrote: I'm well aware of the definition of the word 'prophet'. Perhaps my questions should have been clearer. 
 
You consider yourself to be a prophet with first hand knowledge? Please tell me how you came to that conclusion. 
 
 
Any prophet speaks information ...

nickols_k

<r>JAB;769189 wrote: Uhm, care to explain this one please? :-2 
 
 
In first, please read: 
 
<URL url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophet">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophet</URL> 
 
That speaks AntiChrist, who was born to be free! Who was born under sign 666 ...

nickols_k

<t>Ted;769000 wrote: nickols k 
 
Since we do not have the original documents of the Bible we only have copies. Not only that they are hand copies of copies of copies of copies etc. We have the problem that among the multitude of documents used to write just the NT alone there were some 400 ...

nickols_k

Ted;768152 wrote: nickols k:-6

What was the basic point of that statement?

Shalom

Ted:-6

Means wrongly translated book may not contain good deals!

That speaks AntiChrist, who was born to be free! Who was born under sign 666!!!

nickols_k

Ted;765783 wrote: A good deal of the Bible is metaphorical. There are a few kernels of history spread throughout.

Shalom

Ted:-6

That was not from Bible, surely!

nickols_k

<t>My hour has come, and I appeal to you. 
 
From tops of mountains and from valleys I appeal to those who are looking for the Truth. 
 
Those who accepted Satan believed themselves and try to reassure others in his power and the superiority over the Creator. 
 
Well, the ...

nickols_k

<t>Those who accepted Christ believe themselves and convince others in their own nullity and helplessness. 
 
Well, a man is that how he thinks about himself. 
 
If he had not hoped for itself if he is weak and the poor in spirit then he goes to Jesus. He needs someone who would be ...

nickols_k

Nomad;745285 wrote: To me at least this seems like the sufficient amount of words. Just right Id say.

Do you know english?

nickols_k

<t>rjwould;745278 wrote: I said "the author", however, I believe, if my memory serves me correctly, that the opening of revelations begins with something like, "I, John!" 
 
I don't know who wrote what, nor does it really matter to me. I am a former Christian. 
 
 
John is most ...

nickols_k

<t>rjwould;745254 wrote: Well, it is my view that the author of "revelations" was a person who lived and breathed his religion. When that happens, whether it be with religion or any subject we begin to filter and associate nearly everything in life through that lens to the point of dreaming and ...

nickols_k

rjwould;745238 wrote: Peter was trippin'. Or was it John?

Could you print slightly more words?

nickols_k

That speaks AntiChrist, who was born to be free! Who was born under sign 666!!!

nickols_k

<t>ejputz;717605 wrote: The bible is a collection of personal experiences; most of which are written by common folk. None of the books were written by people with today's journalistic attitude. But the revelation doesn't try to be a text book. It is a metaphor for the condition of the world such as ...

nickols_k

<t>ejputz;717302 wrote: The number refers back to the old testament, to the book of kings. It was the price in 'talents' (the weight of a man) that a certain "wise man" was paid to sell-out his kingdom, back into the hands of it's ancient enemies. It's there to point out the fact that after three ...

nickols_k

<t>HISTORY PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLDS. 
 
This subject I would like to call as the art story, which has appeared according on listening of parts of prophecies. 
 
The origin of the Creator I don't know and to speak correctly, He is living from the beginning of eternity. In ...

nickols_k

<t>Could somebody to help me with spell-checking of prophecy about neutrino? 
 
The neutrino is a vector of promotion in the Universe. The neutrino is the azimuth of the Creator. It is the source of matter and the kernel of the Universe. The neutrino is the basis for creation. It defines ...

nickols_k

<t>spot;612416 wrote: I've done that now, I didn't see the earlier request. You've put a lot of work into writing it, it's an impressive work. 
 
edited to add: Okay, now I know why it wasn't stickied before, and I'm sorry but I've had to unsticky it. I thought stickying just held the thread ...

nickols_k

Would it be possible to make subj about 666 sticky(important)? Simply because the article contains the prophecy of God-Father!

Blessed be!

nickols_k

celina12;592196 wrote: Hi & welcome here!

Thanks you!

nickols_k

Good Easter for all christains!

Be blessed!

nickols_k

Good Easter for all christains!

Be blessed!

nickols_k

Burlesque;587054 wrote: Glad you're saved, nickols_k - wish I had such faith

I want to find saved all of you!

blessed be!

nickols_k

<r>I like when people use european english! 
 
911;582680 wrote: I wasn't gonna say anything in hopes that someone else would do the deed for me. But they didn't. 
 
So. 
 
Here's my question: Why is your website tacked 666 if you are a believer in God? 
 
<br ...

nickols_k

Nomad;578241 wrote: Are you going to bitch slap him silly now ? :-6

Could you rebuild your statement, please?

Blessed be!

nickols_k

DelicateDominatrix;578238 wrote: Thank you

Be blessed!

nickols_k

DelicateDominatrix;578224 wrote: Hi nice to meet you

Respectively!

nickols_k

<t>Pinky;578144 wrote: 666? Well Hi dad! What are you doing here? 
 
You haven't left little Nick or Damien in charge again have you? 
 
I told you that you should have just let me take over. 
 
 
I came here to share information from my article with all of you!<br ...

nickols_k

<t>Nomad;577901 wrote: Im intrigued. When I have more time Ill fully read your thoughts and experiences. 
 
Quick question, after you awakened to health were your revelations immediately apparent or is it something that seeped into your being with passing time ? 
 
In other words ...

nickols_k

SuzyB;577807 wrote: I believe in afterlife, but thats it.

Have you published your story?

Story of my visit into afterlife was published in Preface of my article!

Be bless!

nickols_k

I think the reason I lost interest and didn't continue is purely selfish reasons that I don't believe in the devil and have no interest in reading about it.
I'm living witness for these words! I wrote the events which I saw through my own eyes!

Be bless!

nickols_k

SuzyB;577796 wrote: Of course, i'll just get them

I meant print them into this forum!

nickols_k

SuzyB;577790 wrote: I meant the first three lines at the bottom of all the blue writing.

Could you please print these lines?

nickols_k

<r>Tater Tazz;577773 wrote: What do you want people to think about the article? 
 
 
My job is to inform the people about article but not to convience them! 
 
I read the first 3 lines then lost interest, sorry 
First paragraph was translated by Koan(<URL url="http://www ...

Search found 106 matches