Guess which Party

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:18 am

As i have had a few Private messages asking which party i am standing for in the near future and I'm not telling anyone incase that gmc starts on me :wah:

I thought it'd be amusing to see what your guessing.

So for my amusement alone, please take part in the poll.

Thankyou.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:19 am

You've missed off raving monster loony party

qsducks · Post by **qsducks** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:24 am

gmc;1172246 wrote: You've missed off raving monster loony party

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:21 am

gmc;1172246 wrote: You've missed off raving monster loony party That's because if i'd even considered standing for them....... you would have won :wah:

qsducks · Post by **qsducks** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:24 am

oscar;1172273 wrote: That's because if i'd even considered standing for them....... you would have won :wah:

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:58 am

I say UKIP as you have dropped them into many a post:D;)

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:02 am

UKIP.

Strongly suspect you are bored with reality.:p

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:06 am

Dont think UKIP has a branch in Leeds though

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:16 am

Dont think UKIP has a branch in Leeds though

...oh...

Is there a Blue Rinsed Battleaxe Party? Gotta be the Tories then.

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:21 am

Clodhopper;1172419 wrote: ...oh...

Is there a Blue Rinsed Battleaxe Party? Gotta be the Tories then.

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:03 pm

UKIP?????????????????? :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:06 pm

Fancy Dress Party

Tuppaware Party

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:10 pm

Snowfire;1172446 wrote: Fancy Dress Party

Tuppaware Party

What's Tuppaware?

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:12 pm

Oh alright you :rolleyes:

tupperware

The Pedantic Party :wah:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:17 pm

Snowfire;1172451 wrote: Oh alright you :rolleyes:

tupperware

The Pedantic Party :wah: I prefer the Sardonic Party.

Vesuvius · Post by **Vesuvius** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:26 pm

Since Lord Sutch passed on, is there a monster raving loony party??????????

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:01 pm

Vesuvius;1172616 wrote: Since Lord Sutch passed on, is there a monster raving loony party??????????

Lord Sutch hanged himself and was succeeded by Howling Laud Hope and Cat Mandu. The party is still going strong.

Official Monster Raving Loony Party - Homepage

But, I have not joined them :wah:

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:48 am

Cant see you going for GREEN

I checked out all the candidates for Lib Dem in Leeds and your face wasnt there soooooooooo must be Conservative:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl OMG you turn coat:yh_rotfl

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:03 am

Why do you feel so ashamed that you can't tell us? UKIP are a joke and bnp are fascist enough that they probably appeal to you given your posts on law and order so why don't you come out the closet and fess up. If you are that good you should be able to defend yourself in a political argument. If you can't maybe you should rethink standing.

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:51 am

>Pity party<

I pity the party you join..

:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:57 am

gmc;1172890 wrote: Why do you feel so ashamed that you can't tell us? UKIP are a joke and bnp are fascist enough that they probably appeal to you given your posts on law and order so why don't you come out the closet and fess up. If you are that good you should be able to defend yourself in a political argument. If you can't maybe you should rethink standing.

YouTube - Rowan Atkinson - Conservative Conference
I never said 'I was that good'. I'll be very surprised if i get one vote. It's not for a few months anyway.

I couldn't give a stuff who knows and who dis-approves.

It's the BNP :p:p

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:19 am

It's the BNP

Oscar: Are you being serious?

Post by **Peter Lake** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:08 pm

Clodhopper;1173045 wrote: Oscar: Are you being serious? Yes she is.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:49 pm

oscar;1173036 wrote: I never said 'I was that good'. I'll be very surprised if i get one vote. It's not for a few months anyway.

I couldn't give a stuff who knows and who dis-approves.

It's the BNP :p:p

Thought it would be. What do your muslim friends think of you joining them?

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:17 am

I thought BNP were opposed to immigration??

below is part of a post by you Oscar from the thread with link provided:-2

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/warfa ... umn-2.html

]Why do so many British object to immigration? From what i have seen...... Jealously. They are quite happy to fall out the pub and expect the local Turks who have worked a 14 hour day to still be there at 1 in the morning when they want a kebab. When that same Turk is driving a new BMW from the fruits of his success after he has paid his tax the same as any one else, the British then get white and spitefull.

Total hypocrisy.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:47 am

kazalala;1173402 wrote: I thought BNP were opposed to immigration??

below is part of a post by you Oscar from the thread with link provided:-2

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/warfa ... umn-2.html Kaz. i don't want to fill the thread with BNP policy on immigration but it is something i have talked of long and hard with their people. All i can say, is have you read their policies about immigration or just listened to the scare mongering put out by the press? The reality and the rumour are two very different things

Immigration is not just the main issue with the BNP, there are a wealth of policies along with immigration yet people tend to focus on the immigration as it's just easier for the press to label them all as racist or fascist to put votors off. I was guilty of that myself untl i actually researched them and talked to their people.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:50 am

gmc;1173376 wrote: Thought it would be. What do your muslim friends think of you joining them? Thy have no fear as they are not scrounging immigrants who hav come here for benifits, free NHS and a counil house. They contribute a huge amount to this country and have been for years. It is not foriegn nationals that settle here to live the Brtish way of life that the BNP have an issue with.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:02 am

oscar;1173459 wrote: Kaz. i don't want to fill the thread with BNP policy on immigration but it is something i have talked of long and hard with their people. All i can say, is have you read their policies about immigration or just listened to the scare mongering put out by the press? The reality and the rumour are two very different things

Immigration is not just the main issue with the BNP, there are a wealth of policies along with immigration yet people tend to focus on the immigration as it's just easier for the press to label them all as racist or fascist to put votors off. I was guilty of that myself untl i actually researched them and talked to their people.

maybe cos thats all they seem to talk about, If they have a wealth of policies why dont they talk about them ,,,

If they are just a party like labour or tories etc,, why do the press want to put us off voting for them? why them?

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:37 am

Well on the BNP site this is their policy on IMMIGRATION.

IMMIGRATION - time to say ENOUGH!

On current demographic trends, we, the native British people, will be an ethnic minority in our own country within sixty years.

To ensure that this does not happen, and that the British people retain their homeland and identity, we call for an immediate halt to all further immigration, the immediate deportation of criminal and illegal immigrants, and the introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement whereby those immigrants who are legally here will be afforded the opportunity to return to their lands of ethnic origin assisted by a generous financial incentives both for individuals and for the countries in question.

We will abolish the ‘positive discrimination’ schemes that have made white Britons second-class citizens. We will also clamp down on the flood of ‘asylum seekers’, all of whom are either bogus or can find refuge much nearer their home countries.

It sure looks to me like the BNP wish anyone not born in the UK to go back home no matter what!

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

LAW AND ORDER - crack down on crime!

The BNP will crack down on crime and restore public safety and confidence. We will free the police and courts from the politically correct straitjacket that is stopping them from doing their job properly.

The liberal fixation with the ‘rights’ of criminals must be replaced by concern for the rights of victims, and the right of innocent people not to become victims.

We support the re-introduction of corporal punishment for petty criminals and vandals, and the restoration of capital punishment for paedophiles, terrorists and murderers as an option for judges in cases where their guilt is proven beyond dispute, as by DNA evidence or being caught red-handed.

Crikey Moses Oscar, from Gordon Brown to this???? From one extreme to the other isnt it?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:25 pm

Chezzie;1173634 wrote: Well on the BNP site this is their policy on IMMIGRATION.

IMMIGRATION - time to say ENOUGH!

On current demographic trends, we, the native British people, will be an ethnic minority in our own country within sixty years.

To ensure that this does not happen, and that the British people retain their homeland and identity, we call for an immediate halt to all further immigration, the immediate deportation of criminal and illegal immigrants, and the introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement whereby those immigrants who are legally here will be afforded the opportunity to return to their lands of ethnic origin assisted by a generous financial incentives both for individuals and for the countries in question.

We will abolish the ‘positive discrimination’ schemes that have made white Britons second-class citizens. We will also clamp down on the flood of ‘asylum seekers’, all of whom are either bogus or can find refuge much nearer their home countries.

It sure looks to me like the BNP wish anyone not born in the UK to go back home no matter what!The BNp has never been about just kicking any foriegner out of the country. There is a far wider issue here. Why does any Eastern Eurpean or any other nation come here with nothing, dtraight onto our benifit system and free housing? Simply because Britain is generous and wealthy to them while their own lamds are racked with pverty and no jobs. Large percentages come here and never work. It costs our county billions in welfare keeping them. They don't want to go home beause their own country is so poor. What the BNP is suggessting is that instead of spending billions on keeping them here on benifit for the rest of their lives, any of those WISHING to return to their home land will be given a lump sum which i believe stands at £100,000 each to re-settle in their own country. This money would still be a fraction less that it will cost the tax payers to keep them here for the rests of their lives. That money in their poorer nation is a huge amount of wealth in which they would no longer have to live in poverty, even starting a business and kick starting their own economy. That is the crux of the policy. It is not racist other-wise they would just deport them against their will with no money to go home with.

Why can New Labours pay incentives for immigrants to go home is yet the BNP policy to do the same is shamed? - Yahoo! UK & Ireland Answers

This gives a better view.

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:38 pm

oscar;1173666 wrote: The BNp has never been about just kicking any foriegner out of the country. There is a far wider issue here. Why does any Eastern Eurpean or any other nation come here with nothing, dtraight onto our benifit system and free housing? Simply because Britain is generous and wealthy to them while their own lamds are racked with pverty and no jobs. Large percentages come here and never work. It costs our county billions in welfare keeping them. They don't want to go home beause their own country is so poor. What the BNP is suggessting is that instead of spending billions on keeping them here on benifit for the rest of their lives, any of those WISHING to return to their home land will be given a lump sum which i believe stands at £100,000 each to re-settle in their own country. This money would still be a fraction less that it will cost the tax payers to keep them here for the rests of their lives. That money in their poorer nation is a huge amount of wealth in which they would no longer have to live in poverty, even starting a business and kick starting their own economy. That is the crux of the policy. It is not racist other-wise they would just deport them against their will with no money to go home with.

Why can New Labours pay incentives for immigrants to go home is yet the BNP policy to do the same is shamed? - Yahoo! UK & Ireland Answers

This gives a better view.

Yes it does, mmmm I shall read more...Thanks for the link:D

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:54 am

cheer up oscar you have plenty of support in europe.

YouTube - Saga - European dream

el guapo · Post by **el guapo** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:56 am

at moment no one thinke ya are dumb enough to stand for labour

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:57 am

el guapo;1174148 wrote: at moment no one thinke ya are dumb enough to stand for labour
Thanks Hamster :-4:-4

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:00 am

el guapo;1174148 wrote: at moment no one thinke ya are dumb enough to stand for labour

I still can't believe she's dumb enough to stand for the BNP.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:01 am

gmc;1174145 wrote: cheer up oscar you have plenty of support in europe.

YouTube - Saga - European dream

YouTube - The Last Days of Europe I've seen it before :p:p:p

What is wrong with asking an immigrant to contribute to this country?

You can't just turn up in the USA, Canada or Australia with no work permit and no-where to live.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:37 am

oscar;1174197 wrote: I've seen it before :p:p:p

What is wrong with asking an immigrant to contribute to this country?

You can't just turn up in the USA, Canada or Australia with no work permit and no-where to live.

That's right you have. remember that pub your parents had with all the American visitors? That's where it leads.

So what are their views on miscegenation then? Or come to that allowing Catholics to marry in to the royal family. not exactly British to allow that is it? Give up rule from the eu only to have rule from rome. What will they do with the church of england-not that I particularly care of course.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:38 am

gmc;1174273 wrote: That's right you have. remember that pub your parents had with all the American visitors? That's where it leads.

So what are their views on miscegenation then? Or come to that allowing Catholics to marry in to the royal family. not exactly British to allow that is it? Give up rule from the eu only to have rule from rome. What will they do with the church of england-not that I particularly care of course. You can say that twice :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 2:25 pm

oscar;1174274 wrote: You can say that twice :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

:ostill as a daily mail reader the repetition was probably necessary. stop dodging the question.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:19 pm

gmc;1174356 wrote: :ostill as a daily mail reader the repetition was probably necessary. stop dodging the question.You asked two questions

Firstly, there is nothing wrong with mixed races. If anyone is a British citizen and they want to marry a forighn National and have them live and work in Britain as a couple, there is a heck of a difference between that and mass immigration and opening borders for people who have no work, income or home where we are expected to support them for the rest of their days.

A for Catholics marrying into the Royal Family,:There is no law preventing Catholics marrying into the Royal family, merely from inheriting the Throne if they do. Prince Michael, for example, nobly and uncomplainingly gave up his right to the Throne when he married.

They can not take the throne as the title is head of The Church of England.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:18 am

oscar;1174402 wrote: You asked two questions

Firstly, there is nothing wrong with mixed races. If anyone is a British citizen and they want to marry a forighn National and have them live and work in Britain as a couple, there is a heck of a difference between that and mass immigration and opening borders for people who have no work, income or home where we are expected to support them for the rest of their days.

A for Catholics marrying into the Royal Family,:There is no law preventing Catholics marrying into the Royal family, merely from inheriting the Throne if they do. Prince Michael, for example, nobly and uncomplainingly gave up his right to the Throne when he married.

They can not take the throne as the title is head of The Church of England.

Too bad your new erstwhile leader doesn't agree with you.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/p ... 672185.ece

He is not racist, he argues. He does not believe that whites are superior. He believes that races are different and that multiculturalism is a recipe for disaster. He opposes miscegenation “because most people want their grandchildren to look basically like them. If the liberal elite had its way, the world would become “a giant melting pot turning out coffee-coloured citizens by the million.

You dodged the question on religion I notice. If they're allowed to marry a catholic then at some point a catholic is likely to take the throne. Or-What if wills decide to marry a catholic? or his daughter is the eldest and convert to Catholicism-who knows might happen plenty of c of e members did convert ovet the issue of women priests and homosexuals.

Religion is a bit of a red herring though. You are standing for the British fascist party why don't you just come out the closet and admit it?

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:13 am

gmc;1174448 wrote: Too bad your new erstwhile leader doesn't agree with you.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/p ... 672185.ece

You dodged the question on religion I notice. If they're allowed to marry a catholic then at some point a catholic is likely to take the throne. Or-What if wills decide to marry a catholic? or his daughter is the eldest and convert to Catholicism-who knows might happen plenty of c of e members did convert ovet the issue of women priests and homosexuals.

Religion is a bit of a red herring though. You are standing for the British fascist party why don't you just come out the closet and admit it?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/p ... 672185.ece

Nick Griffin is leader of the whites-only British National Party and one of the most hated — and, to his many detractors, hateful — men in the country. He is a former National Front member, convicted of inciting racial hatred against Jews in 1998 and acquitted of similar charges against Muslims in two high-profile trials last year. He is a man who has called Britain a “multi-racial hellhole”, Islam a “wicked, vicious faith”, British Muslims “the most appalling, insufferable people to have to live with”, overt homosexuality “repulsive” and the Holocaust “the hoax of the 20th century”. He has declared that “nonwhites have no place here at all and [we] will not rest until every last one has left our land”.

You seriously are going to stand as a candidate for a party who will not rest till they send your friends back home???

I seriously dont understand your decision Oscar previous posts of yours. From Brown to Griffin....Please:rolleyes:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:51 am

Chezzie;1174449 wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/p ... 672185.ece

You seriously are going to stand as a candidate for a party who will not rest till they send your friends back home???

I seriously dont understand your decision Oscar previous posts of yours. From Brown to Griffin....Please:rolleyes: You could never accuse me of being predictable could you? :wah:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:51 am

Chezzie;1174449 wrote: The British National Party gains strength - Times Online

You seriously are going to stand as a candidate for a party who will not rest till they send your friends back home???

I seriously dont understand your decision Oscar previous posts of yours. From Brown to Griffin....Please:rolleyes: You could never accuse me of being predictable could you? :wah:

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:00 am

oscar;1174593 wrote: You could never accuse me of being predictable could you? :wah:

Are you turning into Fred Elliot...I said are you turning into Fred Elliot:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:14 am

Chezzie;1174615 wrote: Are you turning into Fred Elliot...I said are you turning into Fred Elliot:yh_rotfl I say...are you accusing me of being predictable?.....I say.... are you accusing me of being predictable?

Chezzie · Post by **Chezzie** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:17 am

oscar;1174644 wrote: I say...are you accusing me of being predictable?.....I say.... are you accusing me of being predictable?

Ashleyyyyyyyy:wah:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:18 am

Chezzie;1174647 wrote: Ashleyyyyyyyy:wah: Reeeeeeta :wah::wah:

I say..... Reeeeeeeeeta

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:32 am

Well, that's a shock - the BNP????!!!!!!

Seriously?

I expected UKIP, or Lib Dems maybe.

Best I say no more................