Circumcision

qsducks · Post by **qsducks** » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:38 pm

Cleanliness..

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:20 pm

parents teach their kids proper cleanliness.......if it gets infected or some other medicals issues later on......

hoppy · Post by **hoppy** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:17 am

I'm goin out with as much of me as I came in with, as possible.

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:33 am

hoppy;1249960 wrote: I'm goin out with as much of me as I came in with, as possible.

will this include your uncle?

hoppy · Post by **hoppy** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:39 am

Odie;1249990 wrote: will this include your uncle?

He croaked last year, pretty much intact. :wah:

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:46 am

hoppy;1249995 wrote: He croaked last year, pretty much intact. :wah:

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:08 am

Male circumcision for cleanliness is a crock. If that's the case, then female circumcision would be appropriate as well and we should all shave our heads of hair as well as pubic hair.Good body hygiene is a very individual thing.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:29 am

Lon;1250050 wrote: Male circumcision for cleanliness is a crock. If that's the case, then female circumcision would be appropriate as well and we should all shave our heads of hair as well as pubic hair.Good body hygiene is a very individual thing.

Many people say that I smell like a crisp clean breeze.

I think theyre jealous.

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:47 am

Lon;1250050 wrote: Male circumcision for cleanliness is a crock. If that's the case, then female circumcision would be appropriate as well and we should all shave our heads of hair as well as pubic hair.Good body hygiene is a very individual thing.
I agree Lon. When my 3 sons were born I argued to not have them circumcised. My wife argued for. She won. (imagine that). I think for some it is more of an aesthetic decision than a hygienic one. Doesn't make it right but it is another reason I suppose.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:52 am

All this penis talk is making me uncomfortable.

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:54 am

Nomad;1250062 wrote: All this penis talk is making me uncomfortable.
Sounds like an adjustment is in order.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:01 pm

Nomad;1250062 wrote: All this penis talk is making me uncomfortable.

I agree---------let's discuss hemorrhoids and pustules.

Post by **Betty Boop** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:08 pm

Lon;1250093 wrote: I agree---------let's discuss hemorrhoids and pustules.

No photos thanks :wah:

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:12 pm

Betty Boop;1250122 wrote: No photos thanks :wah:

oh god, can you imagine that?:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:04 pm

Lon;1250188 wrote: no need to imagine-----viewer discretion advised!!!!

that's taking things here to to far!:-5:-5:mad:

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:43 pm

Odie;1250191 wrote: that's taking things here to to far!:-5:-5:mad:

No further than some of the idiotic, obscene and objectionable posts of the past that were not censored or deleted. We can show breasts, genitalia,etc. but not a medical pic of an anus. Interesting!!

PICTURE OF HUMAN ANUS WAS DELETED BY MOD

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 7:05 pm

We see this all the time-----------tell me what's the difference? One's objectionable and the other not.

Attached files

flopstock · Post by **flopstock** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:02 am

YZGI;1250061 wrote: I agree Lon. When my 3 sons were born I argued to not have them circumcised. My wife argued for. She won. (imagine that). I think for some it is more of an aesthetic decision than a hygienic one. Doesn't make it right but it is another reason I suppose.

i know two guys who have had it done. One in his early fifties and one in his late. something to do with skin tightening or something - they said. Is it possible that while skin is falling off us everywhere else at this age it's trying to revert to original condition in that area?:-2

Anyhoot, they both commented they they wished they'd had it done as babies as they has a hard time dealing with the sensitivity at this point.

Personally I would think they'd just view it as a new toy.

shelbell · Post by **shelbell** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:33 pm

flopstock;1250325 wrote: Personally I would think they'd just view it as a new toy.

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:10 pm

Lon;1250261 wrote: We see this all the time-----------tell me what's the difference? One's objectionable and the other not.

excuse me.........this is a funny pic of a dog.:rolleyes:

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:17 pm

Odie;1250515 wrote: excuse me.........this is a funny pic of a dog.:rolleyes:

What if I showed you of a pic of the same dog with hemorrhoids?

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:55 am

I'm a bit confused, are you all saying that when your baby boy was born the doctor asks if you'd like this procedure done?

I thought it was only done as a religious thing, cant remember any of my friends saying the doctor offered to hack a bit off their baby.

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:43 am

buttercup;1250533 wrote: I'm a bit confused, are you all saying that when your baby boy was born the doctor asks if you'd like this procedure done?

I thought it was only done as a religious thing, cant remember any of my friends saying the doctor offered to hack a bit off their baby.

I'm saying that's not the case in Australia.

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:30 am

I have daughters Pam but i don't think this is common in Scotland as i've never heard any of my friends with sons comment on it, i shall have to ask them now.

At what point does the doctor ask this question, at diagnosis of pregnancy, at your scan, at babies birth?

I would have thought it would have to be at the request of the parents and you'd need a damned good reason why you want it done.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:33 am

Lon;1250250 wrote:

PICTURE OF HUMAN ANUS WAS DELETED BY MOD

That really irks me. They have nothing better to do than delete anuses all day?

hoppy · Post by **hoppy** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:21 am

Nomad;1250545 wrote: That really irks me. They have nothing better to do than delete anuses all day?

Even worse is to have nothing to do all day but post photos of anus's.

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:23 am

Don't wanna see anyone's anus today for sure:wah:

qsducks · Post by **qsducks** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:43 am

buttercup;1250544 wrote: I have daughters Pam but i don't think this is common in Scotland as i've never heard any of my friends with sons comment on it, i shall have to ask them now.

At what point does the doctor ask this question, at diagnosis of pregnancy, at your scan, at babies birth?

I would have thought it would have to be at the request of the parents and you'd need a damned good reason why you want it done.

The doctor asks after the first day and yes I've agreed twice...& why not...it's my decision...both my boys survived and are fine:wah:

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:20 am

It is somethin I feel should be a choice for adults and not foisted upon innocent children. There may be medical reasons but cleanliness is certainly not a valid reason.

What is abominable is the Talmud style of circumcision

Many American male babies are circumcised by medical procedure shortly after birth. However, Orthodox Judaism prescribes circumcision as a religious ritual, to be performed according to strict Talmudic laws. According to those laws, the man who circumcises the infant, the mohel, must suck the infant's bleeding penis with his mouth.

This is not a practice contained to the third world.

It has been performed in the US in recent years and I'm not even sure if the practice is still allowed or has been outlawed altogether. We can only hope